Well, this has not much to do with the world of academia, but everything to do with childish pranks and a litany of other scholastic misdemeanours which you had committed while you were only so high.
Having only left formal education 4 years ago, I still hold dear those halcyon years back in school where making faces at the teacher when his back was turned was not only commonplace, but encouraged amongst us.
When I was in primary school, I was a bit of a swot and a goody-two-shoes. I curry favoured with the discipline master to the extent that I was made a prefect, much to my delight. A prefect has quite a few privileges and one of them includes the right to mete out punishment to his hapless peers.
Of course, I never went overboard. I remembered being assigned to taking down the names of latecomers who could usually be found climbing over the school gate after morning assemblies. I did remember having to stand my ground against over-zealous parents who were upset that I actually had the temerity to take down the names of their precious sweethearts.
On other occasions, I remembered making boys do silly stuff for petty misdemeanours such as shouting exuberently in the corridors, as exuberent hyperactive primary schoolboys are wont to do. I'd make them do jumping jacks or star jumps until their shirts were soaked with perspiration. But I never abused my powers as some of my prefectorial peers did.
On hindsight, I think it was rather dangerous delegating so much powers to a prefect who although was already a senior in primary school, is only 11 or 12 years old.
Our school was a Roman Catholic missionary school so we had morning prayers. It'd be the duty of a prefect to lead the entire school in prayers, including the headmaster and the teaching staff. There was this incident where a prefect, despite his Buddhist background, led us in our usual prayers. Nobody suspected anything until we realised -to our dismay- that he was not a baptised Catholic. Needless to say, he was relieved of his 'religious duties' immediately.
But well, it was quite a laugh. We were all taken for a ride.
So, do you remember anything from your schooldays? Little events which still make you smile upon reflection? Share them with us. It never hurts to stroll down memory lane.
Yelina
In France, we don't have such a system with prefets.
I remember that in 3rd grade, boys in my class were very unruly, and to remedy the problem, the teacher created a traffic lights system.
It consisted in judging our behaviour. If we behaved well, we got a green light. If we did few "stupid things" or were a bit rude, we had a yellow light and if we had a bad bahaviour, automatically we got the red light. Every end of week we did the recapitulation of the past week and at the end of the month, those who had red lights were punished.
As far as I'm concerned, I always had green lights except once where I had a yellow one, just because I pushed a girl in the corridor!
When I think of this, I find it so stupid!!!! But well, that's the only solution my teacher found to control her "little rascals"!!
Loic
Oh! And why did you push the girl in the corridor? Lol.
Yelina
Well, actually in our class we had floor, and to avoid to scratch it we had to wear slippers. So, each time we were coming back the break we had to take off our shoes to put the slippers. And while doing this, I pushed the girl next to me because she prevented me from slipping on my slippers!
Sounds stupid, I know!!
Uriel
We had nothing like the prefect system, either. There was no imposing a hierarchy between children by teachers or principles -- we did that enough on our own!
I was very quiet and bookish in grade school and middle school, and then quiet and strange in high school, when I started wearing all black and dying my hair funny colors. I became as I am now in college.
André in Zuid-Afrika
We used to have prefects, but now we have student representative councils... I just can't understand why one needs to change a system that works! On the other hand, we did mostly ignore the prefects...
André in Zuid-Afrika
Uriel wrote:
We had nothing like the prefect system, either. There was no imposing a hierarchy between children by teachers or principles -- we did that enough on our own!
I was very quiet and bookish in grade school and middle school, and then quiet and strange in high school, when I started wearing all black and dying my hair funny colors. I became as I am now in college.
I was a cute, sweet little boy throughout school... a blonde blue eyed boy.... Of course I still am...
Deborah
I went to public schools (local government funded), so we had no overseers such as prefects. As for punishment, by the time I started to school (1956), corporal punishment was a thing of the past in our area. However, in the first through third grades I was part of the childcare program at my school. It was for young children who would have no one to look after them if they went home at 3:00, so we had structured activities after school until someone could come to pick us up. We were under the care of several women who were not teachers. I fondly remember one of them, a very caring and fair-minded person, but one of the women was a terror. She used some punishments that were so cruel and unusual that when I told my mother, she simply refused to believe me. Once when some kids had been misbehaving, she gathered us around and asked what we thought would be an appropriate punishment. No one answered, so she asked how our parents punished us. Two twin brothers said their father would crack their heads together (poor kids!), so our caretaker said, "Like this?" and grabbed the heads of two of the guilty kids and slammed them together. God! They started crying loudly, of course, and the rest of us sat in stunned silence. Another time, she put a tack (point up) on a chair and forced a boy to sit on it. But even if my mother didn't believe me, apparently enough parents believed their kids, so that this woman was removed from her post.
I never was punished for anything, though, because I was an extremely well-behaved kid and never did anything to be punished for.
Uriel
I also went to an afterschool day care for my first few years of school -- not at my own school, but at another way across town, so I had to endure an hour-long bus ride from one to the other -- with nasty children that the bus driver didn't take it upon herself to discipline (well, she was busy driving). I remember one little boy who was retarded that they used to torment every day -- he just looked so miserable, trying hard to ignore them and mind his own business. I wonder if his parents ever knew what he went through.
But our daycare ladies -- none of whom were teachers, all of whom were pretty young -- were pretty nice to us, and we just played games or did homework in the school gym until we were picked up. After I was about 8 or so I just became a latchkey kid -- I went home after school and was alone for several hours until my parents came home. My mother is now appalled to think that she let me do this -- she says nowadays she would never be so naive! Since my half-sister's father is a stay-at-home dad, she has never had to make daycare arrangements for her.
Loic
Andre: You must be a brave little tyke to have ignored the all-powerful prefects. As we used to say when we were prefects, boys ignore us at their peril.
We had quite a few privileges which I particularly enjoyed, one of them being allowed to cut queues at the canteen.
In the past, it was worst. A prefect had a 'slave' assigned to him. During my time, such a system had been totally demolished, much to the detriment of the education system, I must say.
Deborah: It is amazing that corporal punishment was already outlawed back in the 1950s. When I was in primary school in the 1990s, it was commonplace. I was once hauled to the discipline master's office and told to bend over till I can touch my toes. That sadistic beast then proceeded to administer the three quickest swoosh I have ever heard -and felt- in my life. Needless to say, I could hardly sit down without giving a slight yelp for the rest of the day.
Another common sanction meted out was making us bite a chalk for talking in class. The unfortunate victim would then have to bite it until someone else made the mistake of talking. Only then would he be relieved of the onerous duty of balancing the chalk in between his teeth without touching his tongue.
But in the end, I think the most pointless punishment was to write lines. It is time consuming and energy sapping. It deprived us of time out in the sunshine. I wonder if such punishments are still meted out today.
Quote:
I remember one little boy who was retarded that they used to torment every day -- he just looked so miserable, trying hard to ignore them and mind his own business. I wonder if his parents ever knew what he went through.
Maybe he's now a successful industrialist and woe betides those who had mocked him in the past.
Deborah
loic wrote:
Deborah: It is amazing that corporal punishment was already outlawed back in the 1950s.
Well, San Francisco is a progressive town...
Quote:
I remember one little boy who was retarded that they used to torment every day -- he just looked so miserable, trying hard to ignore them and mind his own business. I wonder if his parents ever knew what he went through.
Quote:
Maybe he's now a successful industrialist and woe betides those who had mocked him in the past.
"Retarded" was the common term for people with Down's Syndrome, so he's probably not a successful industrialist.
Benjamin [inactive]
loic wrote:
But in the end, I think the most pointless punishment was to write lines. It is time consuming and energy sapping. It deprived us of time out in the sunshine. I wonder if such punishments are still meted out today.
My religious studies teacher makes us write lines if we forget our textbook, and everyone in my class is either 17 or 18.
Yelina
One of my maths teachers did the same when we didn't know by heart our theorems. Fortunately, the only time I had to write (the 100 lines), my father went to tell my teacher off and from this time, I was the only student who was deprived of the chore! Thank you dad!!
I want to add that's because of this teacher I started to hate maths and everything related to numbers!!
Deborah
Yelina wrote:
I want to add that's because of this teacher I started to hate maths and everything related to numbers!!
My brother was a math tutor for many years. He once told me that he often felt more like a therapist, since so many people's problems with math seemed to result from negative experiences with their teachers.
André in Zuid-Afrika
loic wrote:
Andre: You must be a brave little tyke to have ignored the all-powerful prefects. As we used to say when we were prefects, boys ignore us at their peril.
The prefects actually had very little powers (and privileges) as compared to the British system (and it seems the Singaorean system). They couldn't do anything to us, so.... Yet somehow they did add to maintaining discipline in schools, which was far better then than it is now.
Pauline
In my school when I was about 9 year-old there was a nasty teacher, and he was *very* annoying, boring and stupid. I don't remember but during the year in his class I smahsed up things and my work was very messy and not possible to read it
I remember one time he told me that I had to write many times that I must rememebr to use a ruler. I had to go to the school library for write those lines, and it was *wonderful*. I wrote some of the words then I looked to the books and was during the entire day in the library. Then after I've completed the lines (I can't remember how many, probably 20 or 50) it was the end of the day so I went to the teachers' room and walked to the teacher who told me to write this lines. He was absolutly surprised and told me that it's interdiction for the children to enter the teachers' room and asked why was I there, then I gave him the paper. He did forget (some hours before LOL!!!) for sure that I was writing those lines
Other punishment what I can remember: a teacher hitted me but after she told me that she was sorry. This was more recently and I don't know why. The teachers in my secondary school are nicer (mostly).
Deborah
I believe my high school had very few serious discipline problems. It was a magnet school for academic excellence (how the hell did I get in there?), which probably had something to do with it. I remember something I read in the yearbook one year -- there was only one fight on school grounds the entire year, and that was staged for the Legal Club.
Walker
Detention was the only punishment you'd risk getting when I was in elementary school. I received that punishment once. It might've been in 4th grade... another kid convinced me to cut a class. He insisted that I go with him to a grove that was nearby. So we went there and sat under a big rock. After a little while I was so bored that I went back.
I was quiet and kept to myself a lot, except from now and then when the entertainer in me came out. But we had a lot of troublemakers during my first years of school. They'd shout foul words in class, take other kids' shoes outside and toss them so that they'd land on the roof, turn on the fire extinguisher and bully other kids - and teachers too sometimes - amongst other things. Transfering those kids from one class to another, or from one school to another in some cases, was the only thing the teachers could do.
In Junior High School the teachers were so clever that they put most of the troublemakers in one and the same class -- my class. Although the worst bad apple of them all was not in my class, thank goodness. They'd start rows and behave like complete assholes sometimes. Us guys they'd usually call jävla svennar (fucking "Swedes" - svenne refers to the name Svensson), but "cunt" and "whore" weren't uncommon names either. And how about taking a shower after gym class when somebody's urinated and masturbated in the shower? Mmm... They'd get thrown out of class sometimes but that was about it. One guy was literally carried out once, hehe.
High School was relatively calm, and the only bullying I ever saw or experienced there was verbal. Except of course for that time when those business field guys filled a guy's bag with water.
André in Zuid-Afrika
Deborah wrote:
I believe my high school had very few serious discipline problems. It was a magnet school for academic excellence (how the hell did I get in there?), which probably had something to do with it. I remember something I read in the yearbook one year -- there was only one fight on school grounds the entire year, and that was staged for the Legal Club.
What exactly is a magnet school? I read the term recently while doing some research.
Benjamin [inactive]
Walker — what you've described sounds rather like my previous school, where I went from when I was 11 until I was 16. My class was apparently voted worst behaved class in the school at one point by the teachers. I think the worst time was Spanish in Year 9 (aged 13-14) — I don't really remember learning any Spanish at all that year, just having to put up with people making a huge amount of noise, going 'woooooo!', throwing paper around, getting out of their seats, kicking footballs about... the teacher gave up trying to teach us verbally, and she just gave us sheets of paper to copy out instead.
I used to be too scared to go outside at breaktime at my previous school, so I used to hide in the library (I was actually a librarian anyway).
The school I've been at for the past two years (and am now just about to leave), however, is completely different. It really is great, and the atmosphere is so much more positive. Unlike my previous school, it's an all-boys school (although there is a girls school adjacent), and I can be openly gay there and not experience any problems because of it — heck, my boyfriend goes to the same school, everyone at school knows about it, and it's all completely fine.
(I wasn't openly gay at my previous school, so I don't know what sort of response I would've got there — but I was accused of being gay all the time when I was there, and it was intended to be malicious).
Uriel
I went to public school in the late 70's and 80's, and no corporal punishment was allowed then. Detention was the most popular form of punishment, and that could be followed by expulsion if you were really bad.
I don't think my little retarded boy had Down Syndrome because he didn't have the facial characteristics, but he was developmentally disabled (to be more politically correct) in some way. Poor kid.
We had student council (with a president, VP, treasurer, etc.) in high school, but they had nopower over other students, and no privileges above us. Not sure what they did, to be honest.
I don't recall any "bad" classes or concentrations of bad kids anywhere. There were occasional ineffectual teachers, but even the "good" kids had no respect for them, so those classroom behaviors were definitely situation behavior on the part of ALL of the students. But few were actually disrupted -- we tended to just be sullen or disinterested, not throwing things or yelling.
I remember the punishment of having to write lines on the board or on paper, but that was way back in early elementary school, and I never saw it again later.
Julian
André in Zuid-Afrika wrote:
Deborah wrote:
I believe my high school had very few serious discipline problems. It was a magnet school for academic excellence (how the hell did I get in there?), which probably had something to do with it. I remember something I read in the yearbook one year -- there was only one fight on school grounds the entire year, and that was staged for the Legal Club.
What exactly is a magnet school? I read the term recently while doing some research.
A magnet school is a public school that offers specialized curriculum, usually with high academic standards, in order to attract students from a broad urban area. When I went to school, I thought they were just schools where all the super smart kids went, I didn't know that the historical purpose behind them was desegregation.
Well I must confess that I wasn't much of an overachiever back in high school. I was in the AP and honors classes but I rarely studied and played hooky alot. My saving grace was that there were several girls in class who'd do my homework for me, let me copy their notes, or spoonfeed me the details on books and assignments we were supposed to read. When it came time for studying for exams, I took a pretty lackadaisical attitude towards the whole process, which would piss off my then-girlfriend at the time because she would be up all night cramming and stressing out over it and I'd still score higher than she would.
The downside to my appalling behavior was that my many absenses and tardies got me several U's on my report cards and kept me off the football and baseball teams.
Uriel wrote:
I went to public school in the late 70's and 80's, and no corporal punishment was allowed then. Detention was the most popular form of punishment, and that could be followed by expulsion if you were really bad.
Yup, detention, parent conferences, suspension, and expulsion were the only courses of action for handling the bad students in my school. The main issues we had were the Latino vs Armenian fights that would sometimes escalate into knife or gun violence, death threats, and cops being called in for some serious ass-whooping. The tension got even worse the years after I had graduated.
Deborah
Julian wrote:
A magnet school is a public school that offers specialized curriculum, usually with high academic standards, in order to attract students from a broad urban area. When I went to school, I thought they were just schools where all the super smart kids went, I didn't know that the historical purpose behind them was desegregation.
I called Lowell a magnet school because that's what it's called now. But before that (and while I was a student there from 1964-1967), Lowell was referred to as a college preparatory school. It had that reputation long before the Civil Rights era, so historically it doesn't fall into the magnet school category.
Julian, I was labeled an underachiever (as were so many) in school, though I was more of an underachiever than most.
Quote:
The main issues we had were the Latino vs Armenian fights that would sometimes escalate into knife or gun violence, death threats, and cops being called in for some serious ass-whooping. The tension got even worse the years after I had graduated.
While I was in high school, there was a racially-motivated killing at a San Francisco high school that caused such rioting in the other high schools that within a couple of days, every high school in the City had to shut down...all except Lowell, that is.
Julian
Deborah wrote:
Julian, I was labeled an underachiever (as were so many) in school, though I was more of an underachiever than most.
Heheh. Well, I was definitely an underachiever and looking back at it now, I think the root of my problems was that I was smoking too much weed.
Deborah
Julian wrote:
Deborah wrote:
Julian, I was labeled an underachiever (as were so many) in school, though I was more of an underachiever than most.
Heheh. Well, I was definitely an underachiever and looking back at it now, I think the root of my problems was that I was smoking too much weed.
I think my problem was mainly that I had recently decided that I wanted to be a dancer, and thoughts of dance kept everything else out of my head -- except for languages, that is. I almost always managed to get an "A" in my language classes.
More about Lowell H.S. -- it was like a magnet school in that you could live in any part of SF and attend it.
A friend of mine from college taught muscial theater dance (that is to say, musical comedy) in a performing arts magnet school in the Norfolk, Virginia area.
Pauline
Deborah,
I cna't imagine that you would be an underachiever at all!!!!! As you said, probably it was because you thought only about ballet and languages.
julian wrote:
Well, I was definitely an underachiever and looking back at it now, I think the root of my problems was that I was smoking too much weed.
LOL!!!
at my school there's no violence or fights, it's okay. At the school where there are more vocational subjects, there's violence, much more drugs etc..The differences are similar with those of the schools Benjamin has described I think.
Benjamin, you've a boyfriend!!!! It's great that the people at your new school accept that you're gay. At my school as well it wouldn't be a problem.
I havn't a boyfriend Recently he LOL!!(who i want to be my boyfriend) invitded me to a restaurant, but after I discovered it was for the birthday party of our friend. at least he isn't her boyfriend!!! I was worried he would be when he organised the party!!!
Liz
BENJAMIN, aren't you asexual anymore?
My primary shool was less multicultural than my kindergarten (lots of immigrants - not the friendliest types). There were only some Gypsies, some Greeks, half-Russians and German-Hungarians (or Hungarian-Germans). I was in a class which was specialised in fine arts. We had loads of art subjects and most of us didn't give a toss about "normal" school subjects. I was a pretty good student but I had some serious problems in the beginning. I was a strange sort... Funnily enough, I was quite conversant with Greek mythology but hopelessly mistook page numbers for numbers of exercises! As a result of this, I was disdained as, well, if not a "dummy" but a "misfit".
There were two types of classes: the art class and the "plain" class. Most of the pupils in plain classes originally wanted to gain admittance to the art class but they didn't manage to. So, most of them were disappointed underachievers and teachers treated them accordingly. Only few children whose parents didn't have the slightest intenton of sending them to an art class felt quite annoyed.
Although pupils in art classes had better results in general, most "elite" parents realised that attending this school is not a surefire way of gaining admittance to a prestigeous university in the foreseeable future. Most of these parents sent their children there out of snobbery because going to an art school sounds classy. However, they didn't even dream of the possibility that art subjects would outnumber normal basic school subjects which are necessary for an entrance exam. So, these parents took their children to elite eight or six form secondary schools or private shools. It wasn't too pleasant an experience to hear teachers say "Talented pupils have gone, all who stayed are underachievers". (FYI, I stayed.)
Anyway, I had quite a good time there, espcially after those snooty girls and boys left. I am critical of them because they deserve it. Most of them were good students but tragically lacked talent as artists. When others, including me, won a prize at an art competition, they were extremely jealous and took the liberty of bashing us in front of others.
Not just these snobby rich children were there but the other extreme as well: the Gypsies. There was a Gypsy community right next to our school. They lived (an still live) in a big house which is an eyesore as it is dirty and worn-down. About fifty people lived in one house in squalor, filth and horror. Some children from the community went to the so-called "plain" class. One of them, called Anita, was bullied by the others because of her shameful past, to be more precise, the dismal condition her family lived in. Once we were asked to tell something about our family, what our parents' job is. When it was Anita's turn, the poor lass stood up, and said: "Well, I don't know what exactly me mum's job is, but some strangers, you know, men visit her and she also visits them regulary. Me mum says to me, don't scare them men off, they give us money. Without them we are lost." The teacher was dumbfounded and couldn't say a word, the children bursted out in laughter. It wasn't funny, though.
PS: I was familiar with Greek mythology at such an early age because my father used to tell me stories from the Greek mythology instead of fairy tales when I was a little child. (Of course, he told my fairy tales as well but those were my grandma's favourites.) I enjoyed them very much...I kept on begging "Please, daddy, the Cyclops-story once again!". Strange families, strange children.
Pauline
Liz wrote:
Most of these parents sent their children there out of snobbery
i hate snobs.
Quote:
It wasn't too pleasant an experience to hear teachers say "Talented pupils have gone, all who stayed are underachievers". (FYI, I stayed.)
It's terrible!!! stupid as well. I think that teachers mustn't never tell someone that the person is an underachiever. If you can't do as well as the others you feel stupid and liek a failure, so you need some encouragement: the opposite of to hear you're underachiever!!!
Quote:
Anyway, I had quite a good time there, espcially after those snooty girls and boys left.
Good
Quote:
One of them, called Anita, was bullied by the others because of her shameful past, to be more precise, the dismal condition her family lived in.
I hate bullies.
Quote:
Once we were asked to tell something about our family, what our parents' job is.
it's not correct to ask such personal questions. For example the children who live in another place (not with their/ a family ) etc.. i can't remember that at school I had to tell those sort of things. The teacher must learn to pose some questions what are more general, for example, where you live is there a person who like music / gardening / sport /cooking etc..
Quote:
When it was Anita's turn, the poor lass stood up, and said: "Well, I don't know what exactly me mum's job is, but some strangers, you know, men visit her and she also visits them regulary. Me mum says to me, don't scare them men off, they give us money. Without them we are lost." The teacher was dumbfounded and couldn't say a word, the children bursted out in laughter. It wasn't funny, though.
It's absolutly the oppsoite of funny. For Anita it's trauma when all the class laugh at her also about her mother. What a stupid teacher why it's necesaary to ask such a thing in front of all the people? There was a girl in my primary school whose parents are very old, and a teacher asked her one day about those grand-parenst. i foudn it very stupid and embarrassing because I knew that they were her parenst. One day my grand-mother went to my primary school for collect me during the day and they told me go home now, someone was arrived. She was my grand-mother but they didn't say (maybe after the teacher made the mistake with the other girl they didn't risk to say it). It's worser what the teacher forced Anita to tell that the mistake of parents /grand-parents, but I can't understand why must teachers be so bossy, stupid and want to knwo those things absolutly not their business.
What the teacher told the class after? Can you remember?
Benjamin [inactive]
Liz wrote:
BENJAMIN, aren't you asexual anymore?
Lol, I never was. It was essentially my way of trying to convince myself that I wasn't gay.
Liz wrote:
There was a Gypsy community right next to our school. They lived (an still live) in a big house which is an eyesore as it is dirty and worn-down. About fifty people lived in one house in squalor, filth and horror. Some children from the community went to the so-called "plain" class. One of them, called Anita, was bullied by the others because of her shameful past, to be more precise, the dismal condition her family lived in
There was this girl at my previous school who was a few years younger than me — I got to know her a bit because she was also a librarian. She was always very dirty and she smelt awful — her clothes hadn't been washed for a long time; her glasses were dirty; her hair was matted, had insects crawling in it, and looked as though she hadn't washed it for a very long time. Needless to say, she was bullied. I always wondered why she was so dirty and what sort of conditions she lived in — I don't know if she was a Gypsy or an Irish Traveller or anything like that. But, of course, I didn't like to ask.
Liz
I don't remember what the teacher said after the incident as I was totally paralysed. Quite frankly I'm happy to not know it...If that teacher said anything, it certainly did much more harm. She was woefully ignorant of childrens' psyche...and of human psyche in general.
Sadly enough, it was pretty normal back then to ask children such personal questions. What's more, our parents' workplace was listed in our grade books. I find it stupid, too.
My form teacher and my peers often made fun of my parents' job. My mum is a music teacher and we went to concerts and occassionally to the opera, so they automatically labelled my as a snob. Besides, they thought of me as being old-fashioned, and were absolutely flabbergated when it turned out that I know something about popular music, and that I do listen to it, too.
My dad worked that time as an executive (i.e. a high-ranked civil servant) in the army. The Hungarian word for this job bears close resemblance to "chief shop assistant". So, everyone took my dad for a chief shop assistant and thought I just mispronounced the word. When I started to explain what it means in fact they (even my form teacher) claimed that this job didn't exist. When it came to the army thing, they exclaimed "Oh, then your father is a soldier!".
Our conversation was something like that:
Teacher: Then your father is soldier.
Me: No, he isn't.
Teacher: But he works for the army, doesn't he?
Me: Yes, he does, but he isn't a soldier. He is a civil servant.
Teacher: Hasn't he got a rank then?
Me: He does.
Teacher: What?
Me: A lieutenant.
Teacher: So he is a soldier.
Me: No, he's a reserve officer. He's a civil servant. He wears his uniform once in a blue moon. He is an executive.
Teacher: There isn't such a job.
Me: Ask my father.
I got a *bit* nervous but I wasn't in a position to show it.
Then all the pupils and my form teacher accused me of not knowing what my dad's job is. Aarrrgh!!!!
Liz
Benjamin wrote:
Lol, I never was. It was essentially my way of trying to convince myself that I wasn't gay.
There's no such thing as asexual anyway! I know some people who define themselves as such...I've always wondered what it was like.
Benjamin wrote:
There was this girl at my previous school who was a few years younger than me — I got to know her a bit because she was also a librarian. She was always very dirty and she smelt awful — her clothes hadn't been washed for a long time; her glasses were dirty; her hair was matted, had insects crawling in it, and looked as though she hadn't washed it for a very long time. Needless to say, she was bullied. I always wondered why she was so dirty and what sort of conditions she lived in — I don't know if she was a Gypsy or an Irish Traveller or anything like that. But, of course, I didn't like to ask.
That's disgusting!!!!! Poor girl. Did anyone hep her find her way out of misery? Anita wasn't like that...she didn't have those nice insects crawling in her hair.
Irish travellers and Gypsies are usually alike...but there are different types of Gypsies.
At primary school I was fequently asked if I was a Gypsy girl because of my not exactly snow-white complexion. As far as I'm aware I'm not. That might be the Spanish blood in me. Sadly enough, I don't speak Spanish ...but it's never too late!
Pauline
Benjamin wrote:
She was always very dirty and she smelt awful — her clothes hadn't been washed for a long time; her glasses were dirty; her hair was matted, had insects crawling in it, and looked as though she hadn't washed it for a very long time. Needless to say, she was bullied.
in such a situation I think that the school must do something to help her. Also, the social services. Havn't the town some people who control the place where children live?
Walker
Uriel wrote:
We had student council (with a president, VP, treasurer, etc.) in high school, but they had nopower over other students, and no privileges above us. Not sure what they did, to be honest.
Same here. I don't think they did much at all besides hang out and drink coffee. Well, I do have some vague memories of them making some more or less insignificant announcements in the assembly hall from time to time. I think that they did it mainly to be part of the crew, to be cool.
Deborah
I was actually on the student council my first two years of junior high school. For some reason, I was nominated for president of my homeroom my first semester and won, much to my amazement, since it was the beginning of the semester and no one even knew me. The same thing happened the next semester. My second year, I was nominated for president and lost, but was elected vice-president. The first semester of the third year, I was nominated for vice-president and lost. I was nominated for treasurer and lost. I was nominated for secretary and lost. In my last semester, my classmates finally figured out that all I wanted was to be anonymous, and no one bothered nominating me, thank God!
All we did was attend meetings, which meant we got to skip classes , listen to the school officers' reports, and occasionally vote on something.
Walker
Deborah wrote:
I was actually on the student council my first two years of junior high school. For some reason, I was nominated for president of my homeroom my first semester and won, much to my amazement, since it was the beginning of the semester and no one even knew me. The same thing happened the next semester. My second year, I was nominated for president and lost, but was elected vice-president. The first semester of the third year, I was nominated for vice-president and lost. I was nominated for treasurer and lost. I was nominated for secretary and lost. In my last semester, my classmates finally figured out that all I wanted was to be anonymous, and no one bothered nominating me, thank God!
All we did was attend meetings, which meant we got to skip classes , listen to the school officers' reports, and occasionally vote on something.
What are school officers?
When I started high school I was chosen to be whatever it was called. My job was to check the attendance of everybody in my class. All I had to do was put marks on a list every lesson and hand in the list regularly. I had no privileges or anything.
Deborah
Walker wrote:
What are school officers?
The school -- or Student Body -- officers (president, vice-president, secretary and treasurer) are elected by the students.
Uriel
I wasn't an overachiever socially in high school, but I could pretty much ace any class I took an interest in, with my eyes closed. I rarely studied, and had an excellent memory for trivia. If a class bored me, I might get a B, for simply not trying. Once I walked out of a class whose teacher was a complete bitch and refused to go back -- the F was fine with me. But I still made the National Honor Society, was listed in Who's Who in American High Schools, etc.
Interesting, Liz -- my father was also a civil servant who worked for the army. I guess our system makes life a little easier on us; while they have ranks equivalent to various military ranks like lieutenant, major, etc, they are called something different -- GS-9, GS-11, etc. But it was hard to tell people exactly what he did -- largely because to this day I'm not sure what he did all day besides play golf!
Liz
Uriel wrote:
Interesting, Liz -- my father was also a civil servant who worked for the army. I guess our system makes life a little easier on us; while they have ranks equivalent to various military ranks like lieutenant, major, etc, they are called something different -- GS-9, GS-11, etc. But it was hard to tell people exactly what he did -- largely because to this day I'm not sure what he did all day besides play golf!
Yes, that makes your life easier. There is nothing more exhausting than trying to explain people desperately the very name of the job. What those civil servants actually did is another kettle of fish -- no-one was genuinely interested in that, I mean those who were busy inquiring about my dad's job.
My dad played tennis instead of golf back then.
Uriel
Quote:
My dad played tennis instead of golf back then.
Good to know that our tax dollars are always firmly at work no matter what the country (or currency)!
Sometimes I would ask myself what exactly it was that he did, but he always said if he told me, he'd have to kill me. (Probably because he had named his 9-iron and his 3-wood and was currently claiming them as dependents on his taxes....who knows! )
bruce
This thread gives me an opportunity to rant about a "prank" that some students pulled at my high school recently.
Every year, some students of the graduating senior class put on a "senior prank" which is something mischievous by which they could be remembered. There was talk about releasing a bunch of chickens onto the lawn, or sticking plastic forks all over the front of the school, but nooo, these seniors decided to do something much worse. Just a couple days before graduation, a group of seniors decided to inflict $30,000 worth of damage to the school. They spray-painted the brick walls, the hallway walls, the hallway ceilings, and the cafeteria walls with "Class of 2007!" They also put super glue into most/all of the keyholes on the doors of the classrooms. School administration had to sandblast the brick walls and repaint all the other walls to get rid of the graffiti. Then, they had to blowtorch all the keyholes to melt away the superglue.
Sixteen seniors were arrested for this "senior prank."
I'm all for being remembered, but I was disappointed in my fellow seniors. If they were going to have a senior prank, then they should have done something a bit less severe. They should have done something funny. They should have done something that didn't cost the school, and ultimately, the taxpayers $30,000!
It's things like these that make me so anxious for college, where I'm going to be surrounded by mature, like-minded intellectuals.
Benjamin [inactive]
bruce wrote:
Every year, some students of the graduating senior class put on a "senior prank" which is something mischievous by which they could be remembered. There was talk about releasing a bunch of chickens onto the lawn,
Haha, some people had planned to release chickens in the sixth form common room on the last day before the final exams at my school a few weeks ago. But they decided not to, because the head of sixth form contacted the RSPCA (Royal Society for Protection against Cruelty to Animals), who informed him that the students could have been prosecuted if they did.
bruce wrote:
It's things like these that make me so anxious for college, where I'm going to be surrounded by mature, like-minded intellectuals.
LOL. I'm hopefully going to the University of St Andrews, in Scotland, and apparently on one evening in November, all the new students have a bath in shaving foam — it's apparently called Raisin Day, or something.
Walker
Benjamin wrote:
I'm hopefully going to the University of St Andrews, in Scotland, and apparently on one evening in November, all the new students have a bath in shaving foam — it's apparently called Raisin Day, or something.
And what do you think of that? Fun or just humiliating?
Porthos
Quote:
It's things like these that make me so anxious for college, where I'm going to be surrounded by mature, like-minded intellectuals.
Tell me about it!!!!!!!!!!! I can hardly wait!!!!!!!!!!
No more dumbing down my speech!
bruce
Benjamin wrote:
LOL. I'm hopefully going to the University of St Andrews, in Scotland, and apparently on one evening in November, all the new students have a bath in shaving foam — it's apparently called Raisin Day, or something.
At the University of California Los Angeles, there's an annual event called "The Undie Run" when everyone parades through the university/surrounding community in their underwear.
Uriel
Quote:
It's things like these that make me so anxious for college, where I'm going to be surrounded by mature, like-minded intellectuals.
Tell me about it!!!!!!!!!!! I can hardly wait!!!!!!!!!!
Let me disabuse you two of these silly notions. You will go to college with the same type of people you went to high school with. 18 year olds aren't any more mature than 17 year olds!
Walker
Uriel wrote:
Quote:
It's things like these that make me so anxious for college, where I'm going to be surrounded by mature, like-minded intellectuals.
Tell me about it!!!!!!!!!!! I can hardly wait!!!!!!!!!!
Let me disabuse you two of these silly notions. You will go to college with the same type of people you went to high school with. 18 year olds aren't any more mature than 17 year olds!
Totally. There will be all kinds of people including pretentious "intellectuals", nerds, 'ordinary' people etc.
bruce
Walker wrote:
Uriel wrote:
Quote:
It's things like these that make me so anxious for college, where I'm going to be surrounded by mature, like-minded intellectuals.
Tell me about it!!!!!!!!!!! I can hardly wait!!!!!!!!!!
Let me disabuse you two of these silly notions. You will go to college with the same type of people you went to high school with. 18 year olds aren't any more mature than 17 year olds!
Totally. There will be all kinds of people including pretentious "intellectuals", nerds, 'ordinary' people etc.
My *elitist* friends and I call the "ordinary" people *normies*
hehe We're really not that mean. I guess you can call us "pseudo-elitist"
Walker
bruce wrote:
Walker wrote:
Uriel wrote:
Quote:
It's things like these that make me so anxious for college, where I'm going to be surrounded by mature, like-minded intellectuals.
Tell me about it!!!!!!!!!!! I can hardly wait!!!!!!!!!!
Let me disabuse you two of these silly notions. You will go to college with the same type of people you went to high school with. 18 year olds aren't any more mature than 17 year olds!
Totally. There will be all kinds of people including pretentious "intellectuals", nerds, 'ordinary' people etc.
My *elitist* friends and I call the "ordinary" people *normies*
hehe We're really not that mean. I guess you can call us "pseudo-elitist"
"Normies" doesn't sound so bad compared to other names I've heard. When I rode the city bus in Uppsala once there were two guys talking. One of them said that only about 15% of the students at the university belonged there, and the rest were idiots who had no business being there. That's the kind of person whose body you feel the need to introduce to your boots.
During your early years in school, did everybody date each other? When I was in 6th grade most of the guys in my class had "been together" with one or more of the girls in the class. In most cases when you wanted to fråga chans på (ask chance on) somebody, a friend of yours would go and ask the girl. If she answered 'yes' you'd be together. For about a month until it was no longer fun. I thought it was just stupid and I was one of the few guys who never took part in it. That's the early years I'm talking about. Of course, by the time we entered Junior High School this behaviour had ceased. We were older and things started getting real and only the daring guys had a girlfriend.
Deborah
I had absolutely no experience of dating or going together until college, because it wasn't until my second year of college that any boy/man was interested in me.
Yelina
Quote:
During your early years in school, did everybody date each other? When I was in 6th grade most of the guys in my class had "been together" with one or more of the girls in the class. In most cases when you wanted to fråga chans på (ask chance on) somebody, a friend of yours would go and ask the girl. If she answered 'yes' you'd be together. For about a month until it was no longer fun.
It makes me think of what was hapenning in my school too. A guy went to ask me if I agreed to come out with his friend. I refused, and from that time, no one came to ask me for their friends! Just one did it again and many times, but it was for the same boy! I think he had difficulties to understand I didn't want him. I had to go and tell him directly. He didn't appreciate and slapped me! When a man's pride is offended it seems he can't do anything but becoming violent!
Loic
I was in a monastry for 10 years so I never had the opportunity to observe if juvenile seeds of BGRs were already being planted in primary school. But I would not be surprised if every 10 year old boy in a co-ed school here has a 'girlfriend'. This is simply a case of children imitating the grown-ups.
Yelina
I wasn't in primary school when this occured. I was in secondary, in what we call in French "collège". Then, we were 12 and not 10. I don't know anyone who came out with someone at the age of 10. But well, I assume some people already had this experience at (what I consider to be) an early age.
Porthos
Growing up, as early as kindergarten it was normal for kids to "date" or "go out" with one another. Lol! At the time, we thought it was serious business, holding hands and all.
6th grade is when I started to see a lot of making out around campus, and about 8th grade, sex, oral sex, and everything in between was quite normal.
Benjamin [inactive]
I think 8th grade = year 9... I suppose around then many people were talking about having sex, although I didn't really believe that many of them were actually doing it.
I read recently that the average age at which boys in the UK first have sex is 17. I'm not quite sure how I'd fit into that though, because I'm never really sure what counts for gay people — I tend to see losing one's virginity as essentially only really applying to heterosexuals.
Elaine
Note: Hello, langcafeinos! I moved the posts about virginity and anal sex to the Adult forum. I didn't do this to censor anyone but I felt that a) the topics had strayed far afield from academia, and b) you can discuss to your hearts' content about the aforementioned subjects w/o scandalizing any of the underaged visitors to this forum.
Porthos
Elaine wrote:
Note: Hello, langcafeinos! I moved the posts about virginity and anal sex to the Adult forum. I didn't do this to censor anyone but I felt that a) the topics had strayed far afield from academia, and b) you can discuss to your hearts' content about the aforementioned subjects w/o scandalizing any of the underaged visitors to this forum.
I was going to suggest that myself.
Pauline
I don't know other people who're "underaged" at Langcafé, but I fidn such a discussion is interesting!! I can leanr some things and I didn't find that the converstaion was scandalizing.
Pauline
Where's the adult forum? I can't find it.
Walker
Pauline wrote:
Where's the adult forum? I can't find it.
It's a 'hidden' forum that only members above a certain age can see and visit. I think the limit is 18 but I could be wrong.
Pauline
bruce
Yes, haha, the adult forum is hidden unless you're logged in and 18 or older. I didn't discover the adult forum until I logged in, and not until a couple weeks ago when I finally turned 18. And let me tell you, that adult forum is definitely for adults only!
Liz
bruce wrote:
Yes, haha, the adult forum is hidden unless you're logged in and 18 or older. I didn't discover the adult forum until I logged in, and not until a couple weeks ago when I finally turned 18. And let me tell you, that adult forum is definitely for adults only!
Yes - I've just tried it! I logged out and it disappeared! LOL!
Pauline
It can't knwo your age. I created a new account but it didn't ask date of birth or age!!!!!!!!! First I made one for my sister, but I made a mistake: I put that she's younger than 13 Then I made another but it didn't ask how old is the new member!!!!!
So, how they know?
Loic
I am afraid you have to ask the administators that, Pauline. But there are rules and they are made with the best interest of the community. I know this sounds very paternalistic, but there is a reason why certain discussions are kept out of the roving eye of the general public.
Don't get too upset over it, alright? Let's stick to discussing about what we know best -viz. academics!
Elaine
Pauline wrote:
It can't knwo your age. I created a new account but it didn't ask date of birth or age!!!!!!!!! First I made one for my sister, but I made a mistake: I put that she's younger than 13 Then I made another but it didn't ask how old is the new member!!!!!
So if "Sophie" is your sister's account, whose is "Palomino's"?