
Loic
|
If clothes maketh a man, what do you usually wear?What is your usual fashion style? Do you adhere to a rigid set of rules and guidelines when you put on your shirt in the morning? Is it absolutely taboo that white socks can never be worn under trousers?
For me, campus fashion is actually very laid-back and I usually wear a pair of polo-shirt, jeans and track shoes to school. If I have a presentation, I'd ditch casual wear for something which looks more corporate i.e. shirt, tie, trousers, etc.
|
Akoni
|
I usually wear hoodies, jeans or army trousers with track shoes or ankle high leather shoes which have some similarities to track shoes.
O and black socks
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
I tend to wear stripy jumpers with either collared shirts or polo-neck tops underneath, and with smart trousers and smart shoes.
When I go to university later this year, I intend to buy as many of my clothes as possible from the Edinburgh Woollen Mill, in attempt at being 'ethical'. I'll try to maintain that style though.
|
Uriel
|
I'm a t-shirt and jeans kind of girl. Except in the summer, when I'm a t-shirt and shorts kind of girl. But of course, at work, I mostly wear scrubs. Which is a lot lke getting to show up for gainful employment in pajamas.
|
Porthos
|
I like to stand out, and be very unique. I like to set trends rather than follow them. So, I'll wear a lot of unique things, although the way I dress might be labeled "prep/jock", or "metro".
I have relatively short, finger combed hair. I wear Ray-Ban glasses all the time. I wear slim fit pants, etnies shoes, long sleeved buttoned down shirts from places like Abercrombie and Fitch or American Eagle outfitters, and I prefer to roll up the sleeves for a more casual look. I wear a lot of t-shirts, preferably tighter kinds, so you can see the muscles. I wear track-jackets, and I wear my letterman's jacket a lot during the winter. I'll wear a leather jacket too. During the summer I wear a lot of board shorts and flip-flops and I grow my hair out long.
I dress up a lot, and I have several "frequently complimented upon" ties, a navy blue suit, a black suit, and a pair of olive green slacks, and grey slacks. I wear Italian shoes, like Salvatore Ferragamo. When I dress up, I wear a lot of colors that most guys shy away from, like pinks and purples.
My cologne selection includes Acqua Di Gio, L'Eau D'Issey, and Lucky Brand. I'm attracted to the citrus scents as they smell best on me, and I find them to be the most age appropriate.
I always have mints or breath freshners on hand, and I'm always applying chap-stick to my lips. And I moisturize. And there are things I always carry in my pockets. Cell phone, wallet, pocket knife, brass knuckles, chap stick, oil pads, lighter, and gum.
So, you can see why my friends call me "fancypants".......
|
Shouga
|
| Porthos wrote: | So, you can see why my friends call me "fancypants".......  |
I wouldn't even expect the average girl to care so much about their appearance as you seem to do!
|
Porthos
|
| Shouga wrote: | | Porthos wrote: | So, you can see why my friends call me "fancypants".......  |
I wouldn't even expect the average girl to care so much about their appearance as you seem to do!  |
Yeah, I get that a lot from people.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
Lol Josh, I had to do a Google image search to find out what many of your things were! It certainly seems that you own a lot more clothes and related accessories than I do!
| Porthos wrote: | | I wear Ray-Ban glasses all the time. |
Even when it's dark?
| Porthos wrote: | | I wear a lot of t-shirts, preferably tighter kinds, so you can see the muscles. |
Show-off.
| Porthos wrote: | | I dress up a lot, and I have several "frequently complimented upon" ties, a navy blue suit, a black suit, and a pair of olive green slacks, and grey slacks. I wear Italian shoes, like Salvatore Ferragamo. When I dress up, I wear a lot of colors that most guys shy away from, like pinks and purples. |
I have a black dinner jacket, which I wear about once a year. Where do you usually wear your smart clothes?
| Porthos wrote: | | My cologne selection includes Acqua Di Gio, L'Eau D'Issey, and Lucky Brand. I'm attracted to the citrus scents as they smell best on me, and I find them to be the most age appropriate. |
Lol — I've never even used deodorant! So is it your opinion that citrus scents smell best on you, or your girlfriend's? In what way do you find those varieties specifically to be the most 'age appropriate'?
| Porthos wrote: | | I always have mints or breath freshners on hand, and I'm always applying chap-stick to my lips. |
Is that in case you suddenly need to kiss someone? I'm addicted to Bonjela (or Kamistad Gel, as it's called in Germany), if that counts, lol.
| Porthos wrote: | | And there are things I always carry in my pockets. Cell phone, wallet, pocket knife, brass knuckles, chap stick, oil pads, lighter, and gum. |
Do you smoke? And I don't even know what brass knuckles and oil pads are, ha.
| Porthos wrote: | So, you can see why my friends call me "fancypants".......  |
So how well does your flamboyant style go down in your social circles? What do family/boys/girls think of it?
|
Akoni
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brass_knuckles
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
Ah... well they'd definitely be illegal here!
|
Pauline
|
| Porthos wrote: | | L'Eau D'Issey, |
I've this as well !!
|
Loic
|
I must say, the smartest clothing article I own is only a sports blazer. I don't have a suit so my blazer frequently masquerades as one. It is a very versatile article, I feel. A navy blue blazer over white shirt and jeans - I prefer the clean-cut look.
Porthos, since you are something of a self-appointed authority on fashion, what do you think of Ralph Polo Lauren? It's virtually the only main brand in my wardrobe and I have been told that if my wardrobe were an investment portfolio, I should seriously considering diversification.
I am eyeing a new tie that is sold at Brooks Brothers. It is said that a solid coloured tie can be paired with striped shirts. What I hate about ties though, is my tendency to stain it whenever I am eating. Yes, I am quite a careless diner.
| Quote: | | I'm a t-shirt and jeans kind of girl. |
Very practical and comfortable, I must say!
| Quote: | | I wouldn't even expect the average girl to care so much about their appearance as you seem to do! |
Shouga, it must be the Latin quality in our dear Porthos. First impressions are important and what better to create one than to look sharp?
PS: I feel that pink only complements someone with a darker skin tone. Someone with a pinkish skin tone and who insists on wearing pink looks silly, in my opinion. Actually, it's not my own opinion per se but one that is based on the collective wisdom of many girls.
|
Julian
|
Re: If clothes maketh a man, what do you usually wear? | loic wrote: | | What is your usual fashion style? Do you adhere to a rigid set of rules and guidelines when you put on your shirt in the morning? Is it absolutely taboo that white socks can never be worn under trousers? |
I don't really have a fashion style, I just throw on whatever works for that particular occasion. I wouldn't necessarily say that white socks under trousers is taboo. Rule of thumb: socks should blend in with your outfit, not stand out. If you're wearing light colored trousers or light colored shoes, then white socks are perfectly acceptable. But avoid athletic socks unless you're wearing sneakers.
| Porthos wrote: | | I always have mints or breath freshners on hand, and I'm always applying chap-stick to my lips. And I moisturize. And there are things I always carry in my pockets. Cell phone, wallet, pocket knife, brass knuckles, chap stick, oil pads, lighter, and gum. |
Big pimpin', spendin' cheese... Are the brass knuckles and pocket knife for self-defense or trendy fashion accessories in your circle?
|
André in Zuid-Afrika
|
Re: If clothes maketh a man, what do you usually wear? | Julian wrote: | | I don't really have a fashion style, I just throw on whatever works for that particular occasion. |
Hm, I'll bet whatever you throw on, looks great on you!
I've been wondering about Porthos' pocket knife and brass knuckles too...
I tend to dress casually, and mostly wear jeans with trendy shirts. I usually hate wearing a suit and tie, but for the right occasion it's fun to dress up a bit.
|
Julian
|
Re: If clothes maketh a man, what do you usually wear? | André in Zuid-Afrika wrote: | | Julian wrote: | | I don't really have a fashion style, I just throw on whatever works for that particular occasion. |
Hm, I'll bet whatever you throw on, looks great on you!  |
Umm, yeah ... usually.
|
Uriel
|
Ig, Porth -- you're one of those?
| Quote: | | Shouga, it must be the Latin quality in our dear Porthos. First impressions are important and what better to create one than to look sharp? |
Not any Latin I ever met, and we're lousy with 'em here!
I'm sorry, but to me, Abercrombie & Fitch screams poseur.
As for Julian:
| Quote: | Hm, I'll bet whatever you throw on, looks great on you!
Umm, yeah ... usually. |
And even better crumpled on the floor.
|
Loic
|
Nobody wears a suit on a regular basis?
When I was in Japan, it seemed that almost every men in their twenties wear a suit to work, regardless of their occupation. I remembered this particular incident in Ginza where a man who was in charge of cleaning the toilets at a shopping centre also dressed immaculately in a suit.
Boy was I impressed. This is truly the mark of a civilised society.
|
Akoni
|
lol, I hate suits, I will never wear one! ever!
|
André in Zuid-Afrika
|
Jeez, who can wear a suit when it's 35 degrees??!!
When I started out as a reporter, we were required to wear at least a tie. Today nobody at the newspaper wears it anymore, it's simply not practicle.
But I must agree, a man in a suit does look distinguished.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
I actually still have to wear school uniform. This consists of smart black trousers, smart black shoes, a white shirt, and dark red and navy blue striped tie, and a navy blue blazer, optionally with a navy blue jumper underneath. We're allowed to take the blazer off in the common room and in the classrooms, but we have to wear it in the corridors, unless the headmaster puts up a notice which says 'shirt-sleeve order', where we have to take our blazers and ties off, undo our top buttons and roll up our sleeves. Except that we always have to wear our blazer and tie during whole school assembly, which we have three times a week — it's quite common for someone to faint during assembly and have to be carried out.
(I go to an all-boys school, by the way).
|
Deborah
|
All my long life, I've tended to occasionally wear fashionable clothes if I thought they suited me (which I've usually thought they didn't); otherwise, I'd fall back on jeans + T-shirt/sweatshirt/some other kind of top or another (I had a lot of those inexpensive, embroidered Pakistani shirts back in the '70s). When leggings came into fashion, I started wearing those instead of jeans. I still do, even though they're no longer fashionable. And I've gained too much weight to consider that anything suits me anymore, so I pretty much don't dress up at all.
I really dislike suits & ties, and was never interested in men who wore them.
|
Uriel
|
I miss leggings, too. Easy and comfy. Came in cool patterns. And I used to have the legs for them!
I don't like suits and ties on men, either. T-shirt and jeans is the combo that I find sexiest -- anything else just looks stuffy.
And as for Japan being civilized because the man cleaning the bathroom was dressed up -- if you smelled the average public crapper in Japan, you might change your opinion! Even the women's were usually foul and disgusting, due to the fact that those toilets are just holes in the floor, and we lack the equipment to aim with anything approaching precision.
|
Loic
|
| Quote: | | And I used to have the legs for them! |
Is that a lament? What I think is quite common these days is for girls to wear that sort of dress with a wide belt in the middle and for them to pair it off with leggings.
I think Sienna Miller started the trend which has since percolated to all four corners of the world.
| Quote: | | if you smelled the average public crapper in Japan, you might change your opinion! Even the women's were usually foul and disgusting, due to the fact that those toilets are just holes in the floor, and we lack the equipment to aim with anything approaching precision. |
Sorry, I was only in Ginza. Besides, these Turkish toilets are actually good for the bowel system. Don't tell me you've never used latrines before when you go camping?
Actually, Japan is only civilised where its (male) dress sense is concerned. I remember walking past by a shop in some seedy corner of Tokyo which specialises in selling schoolgirls' uniform and other sick paraphernalia such as secondhand knickers. How sick is that?
| Quote: | | I really dislike suits & ties, and was never interested in men who wore them. |
A lot of my female friends really like dressed up men. Of course, it's a huge plus if he also bears an uncanny resemblance to Jude Law or Hugh Grant. They are always quick to emphasise that I would not be even a blip on their radar if I turn up in school dressed in a morning suit.
Benjamin: You never fail to astonish me when you share with us anecdotes from school. Once, it was about the common practice of boys sitting on one another's laps. Then it was about how giving one another back massages was a rather established norm. Now, it's about fainting at assembly!
We also had a school uniform but we never wore a blazer unless we were representing our schools on official occasions. In fact, I only wore the school blazer once and this was on loan from the admin office. It's just shirt and shorts for the junior boys (secondary 1 and 2) and shirt and trousers for the seniors (secondary 3 and 4). Our secondary school didn't have a tie as it was established as a Chinese medium school so the metaphor of the old-tie network isn't altogether applicable in my situation.
|
Uriel
|
Yeah, I'm starting to worry about the masculinity of these poor little English boys!
I've certainly squatted to pee my fair share, loic -- in the woods while camping, at outdoor partieswhere I couldn't stand to wait in line, by the roadside on long car trips.... and I've splattered some shoes doing it! In fact, funny story -- I had to do this at a party once when I was much younger, and ended up pissing all over my flip-flops. So I set them by the door to dry. When I came back for them, they had disappeared!
I wasn't too pissed about the theft, though (no pun intended) -- I figured the joke was on them!
|
Loic
|
| Quote: | | I wasn't too pissed about the theft, though (no pun intended) -- I figured the joke was on them! |
My sympathies to that wretched thief.
|
Porthos
|
[quote="André in Zuid-Afrika"]Jeez, who can wear a suit when it's 35 degrees??!! | Quote: |
Well, I do it all the time.I actually have a London Fog coat for such cold days, but I hate wearing it, as it is far too restrictive, and it reminds me of Sherlock Holmes for some reason.
That reminds me of one of my favorite comebacks I remember hearing in school.
"No shit Sherlock."
"Keep diggin Watson."
LMAO! |
|
Porthos
|
| Quote: | | Big pimpin', spendin' cheese... Are the brass knuckles and pocket knife for self-defense or trendy fashion accessories in your circle? |
LOL! Spendin cheese??? And the brass knuckles and pocket knife are for self defense. I used to get in lots of fights where I come from, and I was often the victim of gang related attacks by 3 or 4 guys at a time, so now I've learned to carry some extra ammunition, lol.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Porthos wrote: | | Quote: | | Big pimpin', spendin' cheese... Are the brass knuckles and pocket knife for self-defense or trendy fashion accessories in your circle? |
LOL! Spendin cheese??? And the brass knuckles and pocket knife are for self defense. I used to get in lots of fights where I come from, and I was often the victim of gang related attacks by 3 or 4 guys at a time, so now I've learned to carry some extra ammunition, lol. |
So is that legal where you live? I know that it's illegal to carry a knife here.
|
Shouga
|
| Benjamin wrote: | | Porthos wrote: | | Quote: | | Big pimpin', spendin' cheese... Are the brass knuckles and pocket knife for self-defense or trendy fashion accessories in your circle? |
LOL! Spendin cheese??? And the brass knuckles and pocket knife are for self defense. I used to get in lots of fights where I come from, and I was often the victim of gang related attacks by 3 or 4 guys at a time, so now I've learned to carry some extra ammunition, lol. |
So is that legal where you live? I know that it's illegal to carry a knife here. |
You can carry pocket knives in the UK, as long as the blade isn't longer than 3 inches.
|
Uriel
|
Tch. Since when does anyone care about legal? You do what's expedient.
And obviously somebody does not have a decent hip-hop education....("spendin' cheese" -- Jay-Z, anyone?)
|
Julian
|
| Uriel wrote: | | And obviously somebody does not have a decent hip-hop education....("spendin' cheese" -- Jay-Z, anyone?) |
|
Uriel
|
(Sigh) -- these kids today, I tell you....
|
Loic
|
I was always impressed upon by my teachers that a gentleman should always wear a tie whereas my mother has incalculated in me a habit of never leaving home without a handkerchief.
So I think I am a little old-fashioned in many ways. Somehow, I feel that wearing jeans and t-shirt all the time can be a little disrespectful. If I were to meet a business client and he were to turn up for the meeting in that kind of attire, he can forget about any kind of contract.
|
Joanne
|
Re: If clothes maketh a man, what do you usually wear? | loic wrote: | | What is your usual fashion style? | Hmm... I'd like to say I'm a jeans and t-shirt type, but l'm looking at my closet right now, and most of the stuff in there is from Ann Taylor, Ann Taylor Loft, and J.Crew.
This is very distressing...
|
Uriel
|
Hey, J. Crew sells some nice sweaters.
|
Uriel
|
Okay, it's not clothing, but it is something I wear all the time -- and now I do mean all the time.... over the weekend, I finally broke down and got permanent eyeliner -- my first tattoo.
Now this:
is forever (or at least five years, which is how long the pigment is guaranteed for. It's not a very deep tattoo -- only into the dermal layer, so it probably won't go to the grave with me. But, maybe it will....)
|
Loic
|
At the risk of sounding like a dandy -which I resolutely am not-, what do the male population of this forum think of Thomas Pink and Alain Figaret shirts?
Unfortunately, Thomas Pink has yet to set up shop in Singapore, but I am interested in buying one via the Internet. I have heard rave reviews about it; I also have heard that they wrinkle up very quickly.
On the other hand, I bought an Alain Figaret shirt a fortnight ago, blowing SGD 250 (US$150) in the process. In your opinion, what is the price ceiling for a shirt before it becomes over priced?
|
Uriel
|
About forty bucks. And I've never heard of the two designers you speak of.
Maybe it's because I'm not a clothes person, but if I ever met a guy who admitted spending that kind of cash on a single shirt, I would question his common sense -- imagine all the other stuff you could have bought with that money. All you got was a shirt like any other shirt. I certainly wouldn't be able to tell the difference between that and something cheaper, so what's the point?
Any shirt that cost me three figures would need to iron itself, make its own way into the washing machine, and probably order me a pizza while it was at it.
|
Loic
|
Funny, that's what many of my mates actually said. The girls, on the other hand, seem to take a kindlier attitude towards such indulgences.
I actually see it as a possible investment with a vain hope that they might actually generate cash flows. How? I am not sure. Maybe if I ever file for bankruptcy and have my assets liquidated, these shirts would count towards my total net worth.
Alain Figaret is a premier French shirtmaker which mainly operates in France with international outlets only in Tokyo, HK and Singapore.
|
Loic
|
Funny, that's what many of my mates actually said. The girls, on the other hand, seem to take a kindlier attitude towards such indulgences.
I actually see it as a possible investment with a vain hope that they might actually generate cash flows. How? I am not sure. Maybe if I ever file for bankruptcy and have my assets liquidated, these shirts would count towards my total net worth.
Alain Figaret is a premier French shirtmaker which mainly operates in France with international outlets only in Tokyo, HK and Singapore.
|
Loic
|
Actually, you can tell the difference between the real McCoy and a shameless imitation. Price is often a value indicator and I don't buy the argument that a shirt below 100 dollars can hold a candle to a Prada shirt that costs at least 500.
Are you familiar with Lacoste? Do you know how to tell the difference between a real Lacoste and a fake one? The trick lies in the buttons as well as the size of the crocodile.
I wouldn't be caught dead wearing an imitation Lacoste!
|
Deborah
|
| loic wrote: | | At the risk of sounding like a dandy -which I resolutely am not-, what do the male population of this forum think of Thomas Pink and Alain Figaret shirts? |
I think that should read "At the risk of sounding like a dandy - which I resolutely do not want to be considered".
|
Loic
|
| Quote: | | I think that should read "At the risk of sounding like a dandy - which I resolutely do not want to be considered". |
Haha. Does it seem wrong when a guy is interested in shirts?
|
Uriel
|
To the extent that you compare $100 and $500 shirts, worry about the size of the lizard on them, and consider them a monetary investment ... yes.
|
Joanne
|
You spend that much on your shirts, Loic? Yikes " alt="" border="0" /> Please tell me you bargain down the salespeople, at least! Otherwise, I'll have to revoke your Asian Card
|
Loic
|
Crocodile, Uriel! Not lizard! God, how ghastly it'd be if a shirt logo is a lizard!
Well Joanne, I really cannot bargain. My haggling skills are never good. I think one needs to really have very thick skin in order to succeed in this endeavour. I simply can't.
Besides, bargaining is not applicable at department stores!
|
Elaine
|
If my boyfriend spent $100-$500 on a shirt, I would chew him out for not using his money more wisely-- like on a pair of Jimmy Choos for moi!
|
Joanne
|
| Elaine wrote: | If my boyfriend spent $100-$500 on a shirt, I would chew him out for not using his money more wisely-- like on a pair of Jimmy Choos for moi!  | $500 Jimmy Choos are perfectly understandable! Each pair is a work of art!
| loic wrote: | Well Joanne, I really cannot bargain. My haggling skills are never good. I think one needs to really have very thick skin in order to succeed in this endeavour. I simply can't.
Besides, bargaining is not applicable at department stores! |
Ah, true. Very well. I won't report you, and you may keep your Asian Card.
Have you noticed that the younger generations aren't as adept at bargaining as previous generations? My godmother and her husband are scary when they're out in the markets. They'll pinch a penny until it takes out a restraining order. Their children aren't as ruthless, though, much to their consternation.
|
Deborah
|
| loic wrote: | | Does it seem wrong when a guy is interested in shirts? |
It doesn't seem any worse than when woman spend lots of money on a single article of clothing; it's just that the desire to do so is not one I've ever experienced. By the way, is there a word for the female equivalent of a dandy? I've always thought of such women as "clothes horses", but that term is ancient.
|
Loic
|
Does a Jimmy Choo cost less than $500?
For one, I can never understand the perennial female fascination with shoes. What is the point of having over a thousand pair of shoes? Apparently, Imelda Marcos thinks otherwise.
Deborah, I don't think a specific term exists for women who love clothes. We just call them...erm...women indulging in womanly pursuits.
|
Uriel
|
I can't imagine what would be fascinating about shoes. I am completely indifferent to them. I certainly never check out anyone's feet.
|
Loic
|
| Uriel wrote: | | I can't imagine what would be fascinating about shoes. I am completely indifferent to them. I certainly never check out anyone's feet. |
Actually, I was told that when women check out men, they start from the bottom before making their way to the top. Hence the importance of a good pair of Italian shoes.
But I think a pair of Oxfords would usually suffice. It is not as if I have received an invitation to Buckingham Palace or something.
|
Uriel
|
Yeah, I've heard that crap, too. "Shoes and accessories can be used to size up the man." Maybe some women look at those things and make their decisions accordingly. I never have.
|
Julian
|
The most I've ever spent on a shirt was $85, and even then I had buyer's remorse. Now, if I want to go high-end, which is very rarely since I'm not a name-brand type of person, I head over to Ross and get last season's fashions. Or I simply ring up wardrobe stylist friends of mine and buy wholesale.
|
Walker
|
I've never cared for fashion and I avoid the trends that come and go. A lot of them are ridiculous anyway. I always wear jeans except when I want to dress up for some special occasion. I own a suit that I've worn only a few times in the last seven years. A cleaner doing his job while wearing a suit would seem very out of place here, you would wonder what the hell was going on. We don't have school uniforms here and most men do not wear a suit very often (business types excluded). I actually wore a shirt and tie beneath a sweater at Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve, and I was probably the only guy my age that wore a tie. As far as I could see, anyway. We're not very formal in this country.
Brass knuckles, eh? Do you still (feel that you) need them, Porthos? And the knife?
Uriel, (hey babe, btw, how goes it for ya?) are you implying that a lot of 'ordinary' people break the law where you live?
I tend to look at people's foot-wear pretty often. Shoes sometimes give you an impression of what their owner is like.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Walker wrote: | | Uriel, (hey babe, btw, how goes it for ya?) are you implying that a lot of 'ordinary' people break the law where you live? |
It wouldn't surprise me. Although I obviously don't live anywhere near Uriel, I've broken the law on numerous occasions, and I'm generally seen as a 'well behaved' sort of person.
I'm not entirely sure whether or not I was breaking the law in Poland last week by drinking (far too much) vodka in pubs there and not actually being 18 yet because:
a). I gave other people the money to buy vodkas for me (some of whom were admittedly younger than me), but never went to the bar myself;
b). Age is counted a bit differently in Poland and I think that I may technically be 18 by Polish standards anyway.
|
Walker
|
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Uriel, (hey babe, btw, how goes it for ya?) are you implying that a lot of 'ordinary' people break the law where you live? |
It wouldn't surprise me. Although I obviously don't live anywhere near Uriel, I've broken the law on numerous occasions, and I'm generally seen as a 'well behaved' sort of person. |
Yeah, but you don't carry concealed weapons, do you?
| Benjamin wrote: | I'm not entirely sure whether or not I was breaking the law in Poland last week by drinking (far too much) vodka in pubs there and not actually being 18 yet because:
a). I gave other people the money to buy vodkas for me (some of whom were admittedly younger than me), but never went to the bar myself;
b). Age is counted a bit differently in Poland and I think that I may technically be 18 by Polish standards anyway. |
Do you know what would've happened to your 'dealers' if they'd been caught? Or was it obvious to the staff but they didn't care?
|
Pauline
|
| Benjamin wrote: | | a). I gave other people the money to buy vodkas for me (some of whom were admittedly younger than me), |
| Quote: | | b). Age is counted a bit differently in Poland and I think that I may technically be 18 by Polish standards anyway. |
How can it be that your age is counted differently? You are 1 when you are born? I thought that in Korea they count this way. Or, the polish year has only 265 days?
|
Elaine
|
| Walker wrote: | | I tend to look at people's foot-wear pretty often. Shoes sometimes give you an impression of what their owner is like. |
Oh, I agree. Sometimes I'll see men in nice designer suits, but their shoes are all scuffed up or they're wearing doc marten type shoes and I'll think "Okay, this person's not who he's presenting himself to be." Immediate red flag for me.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Walker wrote: | | Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Uriel, (hey babe, btw, how goes it for ya?) are you implying that a lot of 'ordinary' people break the law where you live? |
It wouldn't surprise me. Although I obviously don't live anywhere near Uriel, I've broken the law on numerous occasions, and I'm generally seen as a 'well behaved' sort of person. |
Yeah, but you don't carry concealed weapons, do you? |
You're right, I don't.
| Walker wrote: | | Benjamin wrote: | I'm not entirely sure whether or not I was breaking the law in Poland last week by drinking (far too much) vodka in pubs there and not actually being 18 yet because:
a). I gave other people the money to buy vodkas for me (some of whom were admittedly younger than me), but never went to the bar myself;
b). Age is counted a bit differently in Poland and I think that I may technically be 18 by Polish standards anyway. |
Do you know what would've happened to your 'dealers' if they'd been caught? |
No idea, but probably not much, all things considered. Although I realise that what I was doing was 'wrong', and that the 'everybody does it' argument is not valid, I will say that I know very very few people who haven't bought alcohol illegally, and I've never heard of anyone actually being prosecuted for selling it to underaged people — in England, where these sorts of regulations are supposedly more strictly enforced than in Poland.
| Walker wrote: | | Or was it obvious to the staff but they didn't care? |
Some of staff asked for IDs, others didn't (it depended where you went). I assume that those who didn't believed that we were all at least 18 — it was kind of dark anyway.
| Pauline wrote: | | Quote: | | b). Age is counted a bit differently in Poland and I think that I may technically be 18 by Polish standards anyway. |
How can it be that your age is counted differently? You are 1 when you are born? I thought that in Korea they count this way. Or, the polish year has only 265 days?  |
Basically, in Poland, you add a year to your age on 1st January. So, although I'm not technically 18 until 22nd April, I *think* that in the Polish system I became 18 on 1st January this year.
|
Walker
|
| Elaine wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | I tend to look at people's foot-wear pretty often. Shoes sometimes give you an impression of what their owner is like. |
Oh, I agree. Sometimes I'll see men in nice designer suits, but their shoes are all scuffed up or they're wearing doc marten type shoes and I'll think "Okay, this person's not who he's presenting himself to be." Immediate red flag for me. |
Red flag? That you wouldn't go out with them, or?
| Benjamin wrote: | | No idea, but probably not much, all things considered. Although I realise that what I was doing was 'wrong', and that the 'everybody does it' argument is not valid, I will say that I know very very few people who haven't bought alcohol illegally, and I've never heard of anyone actually being prosecuted for selling it to underaged people — in England, where these sorts of regulations are supposedly more strictly enforced than in Poland. |
Yes, that's what me and my friends did as well. Before we turned 18 we'd have somebody's big brother go and buy beer for us. It's illegal but that just the way it is.
|
Elaine
|
| Walker wrote: | | Elaine wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | I tend to look at people's foot-wear pretty often. Shoes sometimes give you an impression of what their owner is like. |
Oh, I agree. Sometimes I'll see men in nice designer suits, but their shoes are all scuffed up or they're wearing doc marten type shoes and I'll think "Okay, this person's not who he's presenting himself to be." Immediate red flag for me. |
Red flag? That you wouldn't go out with them, or? |
No, not necessarily. It's just a warning sign to be wary of false profit$.
|
Walker
|
| Elaine wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Elaine wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | I tend to look at people's foot-wear pretty often. Shoes sometimes give you an impression of what their owner is like. |
Oh, I agree. Sometimes I'll see men in nice designer suits, but their shoes are all scuffed up or they're wearing doc marten type shoes and I'll think "Okay, this person's not who he's presenting himself to be." Immediate red flag for me. |
Red flag? That you wouldn't go out with them, or? |
No, not necessarily. It's just a warning sign to be wary of false profit$.  |
Aha! One can't be too careful in a city like LA, I suppose.
|
Elaine
|
| Walker wrote: | | Elaine wrote: | No, not necessarily. It's just a warning sign to be wary of false profit$.  |
Aha! One can't be too careful in a city like LA, I suppose. |
True. It's the land of make-believe after all, and there are plenty of people in this god-forsaken town who'll make you believe anything.
[/img]
|
Joanne
|
She looks very.... Stepford. Perhaps Nicole can give her a few pointers on how to escape.
|
Walker
|
Elaine, sometimes I get this feeling that you don't like LA very much ( ) Is that so?
Shit, when me and my friends went out last friday night one of my friends told me that I look like an economist. I guess I do bear a resemblance to a grown-up version of those guys I used to despise in High School. I already knew it but no one had said it to me before.
|
Uriel
|
Oh, I think people from LA just know the place well enough to be realistic about it.
I suppose there are worse things than looking like an economist, Walker. Like an IRS agent .... and I still haven't done my taxes!
|
Deborah
|
| Uriel wrote: | | I suppose there are worse things than looking like an economist, Walker. Like an IRS agent .... |
Or an FBI agent -- I saw a few of those lurking around the Soviet consulate when I was going through the process of getting a visa to visit the Soviet Union. They stuck out like proverbial sore thumbs.
|
Walker
|
| Uriel wrote: | | I suppose there are worse things than looking like an economist, Walker. Like an IRS agent.... |
I guess you're right.
| Uriel wrote: | ...and I still haven't done my taxes!  |
Is that a complicated matter in the US?
Or is the cause of your anger/frustration something else?
Or maybe it's a combination of both? Around these blocks it's very simple for a private person to do his/her taxes. The form is already filled out when you receive it and you just have to approve it. Of course you might want to have a look at it first. Well, at least you get to keep a bit of your salary!
| Deborah wrote: | | Uriel wrote: | | I suppose there are worse things than looking like an economist, Walker. Like an IRS agent .... |
Or an FBI agent -- I saw a few of those lurking around the Soviet consulate when I was going through the process of getting a visa to visit the Soviet Union. They stuck out like proverbial sore thumbs. |
That must've been uncomfortable.
Seriously, though, what did they look like?
|
Elaine
|
| Walker wrote: | Elaine, sometimes I get this feeling that you don't like LA very much ( ) Is that so? |
What? Whatever gave you that idea? I love LA! We Angelenos just like to poke fun of our city b/c there's so much to laugh about.
| Quote: | | Is that a complicated matter in the US? |
If you're a lower bracket income earner with little or no assets or property and little to claim, then filing your taxes can be a very simple and painless process. However, if you've got property, investments, lots of interest income, several dependents, owe lots of money, have plenty of exemptions to claim, own a business, etc., etc., then it can be a very frustrating and stressful process. That's why most everybody I know has their accountant do it for them. I, myself, get stressed just figuring out which forms I need to file.
| Quote: | | Around these blocks it's very simple for a private person to do his/her taxes. The form is already filled out when you receive it and you just have to approve it. |
You're kidding! ??
|
Deborah
|
| Walker wrote: | | Deborah wrote: | | Uriel wrote: | | I suppose there are worse things than looking like an economist, Walker. Like an IRS agent .... |
Or an FBI agent -- I saw a few of those lurking around the Soviet consulate when I was going through the process of getting a visa to visit the Soviet Union. They stuck out like proverbial sore thumbs. |
That must've been uncomfortable.
Seriously, though, what did they look like? |
This was around 1990. Black pants, short-sleeved white shirts with conservative ties, short, neatly-combed hair, and a general look of being very out of place in San Francisco. Of course, those were the ones I noticed; maybe they were just decoys and the real FBI agents blended in better.
|
Uriel
|
Maybe they were just Mormons, Deborah!
No, I can actually do my own taxes -- I'm in a low enough bracket and all I claim is my student loan interest. It's just sitting down and filling out the form and doing the math.... It isn't filled out for you, but it walks you through pretty easily:
1040EZ
Line 1: How much did you make last year?
Line 2: Send it in.
Just kidding -- it's not that bad. My taxes are about a quarter of my gross income, they're already withheld from my paychecks, and I'm usually just looking for a return on some -- I usually get about $300-400 back, between state and federal. (Oh yeah -- did I mention that we have to do our taxes twice? One form for Uncle Sam, and one for the state -- unless you're lucky enough to live in a state like Texas, which has no state income tax. On the flip side, you can be unlucky enough to live in a state like New York, where some cities charge you an additional city income tax!)
Back in the day, we had an IRS office in town where if you brought all your paperwork and forms in, they would actually do them for you -- for free. Sounds like a set-up, but that was the one year that I owed money, and the agent went through hell and high water to figure out a way to offset it so I wouldn't have to pay, because he felt sorry for me (gasp! they have feelings!) -- he even redid my back taxes from the year before. I ended up just breaking even.
Of course, shortly after I discovered this service, it was discontinued. Ain't that always the way?
|
Wanderin
|
Re: If clothes maketh a man, what do you usually wear? | loic wrote: | | What is your usual fashion style? |
in summer:
rock style as well:
in winter
|
Loic
|
Very chic, Wanderin!
Although I must say that your winter wear suggests to me the aggression of Jack Frost nipping away at exposed body parts.
|
Walker
|
| Elaine wrote: | | If you're a lower bracket income earner with little or no assets or property and little to claim, then filing your taxes can be a very simple and painless process. However, if you've got property, investments, lots of interest income, several dependents, owe lots of money, have plenty of exemptions to claim, own a business, etc., etc., then it can be a very frustrating and stressful process. |
I see. I would most definitely fall into the first category.
| Elaine wrote: | | That's why most everybody I know has their accountant do it for them. |
Wow, their accountant... is that expensive?
| Elaine wrote: | | I, myself, get stressed just figuring out which forms I need to file. |
Eh? You're a Financial Analyst, aren't you? Sounds as if you'd be intrested in that sort of thing (not that I really know what it is you do for a living).
| Elaine wrote: | | You're kidding! ?? |
I'm not. The form isn't filled out completely but a much of it is. Basically you just approve it via SMS, phone, or the internet, or you send in the form itself. Simple and you don't have to bother very much. I don't know how much more complicated it is for a person who has those things you mentioned, like a business, lots of interest income etc.
| Uriel wrote: | No, I can actually do my own taxes -- I'm in a low enough bracket and all I claim is my student loan interest. It's just sitting down and filling out the form and doing the math.... It isn't filled out for you, but it walks you through pretty easily:
1040EZ
Line 1: How much did you make last year?
Line 2: Send it in.
Just kidding -- it's not that bad. My taxes are about a quarter of my gross income, they're already withheld from my paychecks, and I'm usually just looking for a return on some -- I usually get about $300-400 back, between state and federal. (Oh yeah -- did I mention that we have to do our taxes twice? One form for Uncle Sam, and one for the state -- unless you're lucky enough to live in a state like Texas, which has no state income tax. On the flip side, you can be unlucky enough to live in a state like New York, where some cities charge you an additional city income tax!) |
" alt="" border="0" /> So it depends on where you live how many times you have to do your taxes? That's not fair!
|
Uriel
|
It's the United States of America -- each state is a fairly autonomous entity, you know, and they can decide for themselves how they want to structure taxes.
| Quote: | | Wow, their accountant... is that expensive? |
Last year I broke down and had a local tax service do mine for me -- I paid about $65. H&R Block (a major, nationwide tax service) wanted more than double that amount -- I turned them down. I think sometimes they charge a percentage of your return, or charge their fees according to how many different forms they have to fill out, but I'm not sure.
You can also just buy the TurboTax software and it pretty much does most of it for you, suggests things you might want to claim, and files it directly to the IRS electronically.
|
Deborah
|
Most of my life, all I've had to declare was taxed income, so I was able to use the 1040 EZ form, or do telefiling. But for the last few years, I've been in the next higher income bracket, so I have to fill out the slightly more time-consuming 1040. But since I still only have to worry about reporting taxed income, it's still pretty simple. And I still get a bit of a refund, thanks to the flexible spending benefits program. That consists of declaring a certain amount of income that you want your employer to take out of your salary to be put in a fund for covering medical or dependent care expenses that aren't covered by insurance. You submit your bills and get refunded for them, but the advantage is that it makes your taxable income less.
|
Walker
|
| Uriel wrote: | | Quote: | | Wow, their accountant... is that expensive? | It's the United States of America -- each state is a fairly autonomous entity, you know, and they can decide for themselves how they want to structure taxes. |
Yeah, I know... but wouldn't you prefer that all states have the same tax system? Just strikes me as a little crazy that one's fellow countrymen should pay either more or less taxes than oneself does (even though your nation consists of fairly autonomous states).
| Uriel wrote: | | Last year I broke down and had a local tax service do mine for me -- I paid about $65. H&R Block (a major, nationwide tax service) wanted more than double that amount -- I turned them down. I think sometimes they charge a percentage of your return, or charge their fees according to how many different forms they have to fill out, but I'm not sure. |
I reckon you got a pretty good deal then!
| Uriel wrote: | | You can also just buy the TurboTax software and it pretty much does most of it for you, suggests things you might want to claim, and files it directly to the IRS electronically. |
Seems like a very handy program.
|
Elaine
|
| Walker wrote: | | Wow, their accountant... is that expensive? |
It certainly can be. Accountants can either charge by the hour, charge based on the task at hand, or charge based on a pre-negotiated fixed fee on long term projects. Also, CPAs normally costs a lot more than your average accountant.
| Walker wrote: | | Elaine wrote: | | I, myself, get stressed just figuring out which forms I need to file. |
Eh? You're a Financial Analyst, aren't you? Sounds as if you'd be interested in that sort of thing (not that I really know what it is you do for a living). |
I was being facetious. I usually do my friends' and family's taxes (for a small fee). Some of them are good at organizing their records, while others hand me piles of crumpled paper with indecipherable scribble, in between receipts for beauty parlors, dog grooming, dry cleaning, etc... and they don't even own a business! They leave it to me to sort things out and figure out what forms they need to submit.
|
Uriel
|
| Quote: | | Yeah, I know... but wouldn't you prefer that all states have the same tax system? Just strikes me as a little crazy that one's fellow countrymen should pay either more or less taxes than oneself does (even though your nation consists of fairly autonomous states). |
Hell no; that's the beauty of the US -- it's all different! If you don't like the laws or conditions in one state, you can move to another -- and one state isn't bound by what their neighbors are doing. This applies to a lot more than just tax laws -- social programs, pollution laws, etc. can all vary from one state to another. Imagine if California were dragged down by what Missouri is doing, or vice-versa.
States actually use their tax laws to entire businesses to relocate to them -- dinky states like Delaware advertise themselves as tax havens, for instance. Not unlike what some countries do. And my former employer at the local sports arena was always having to compete with a similar one in El Paso -- made more of a headache because NM charges gross receipts tax on ticket sales, whereas Texas does not; which meant other numbers had to be juggled to satisfy Santa Fe's requirements but also keep our bid competitive with our neighbor down the freeway.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Uriel wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Yeah, I know... but wouldn't you prefer that all states have the same tax system? Just strikes me as a little crazy that one's fellow countrymen should pay either more or less taxes than oneself does (even though your nation consists of fairly autonomous states). |
Hell no; that's the beauty of the US -- it's all different! If you don't like the laws or conditions in one state, you can move to another -- and one state isn't bound by what their neighbors are doing. This applies to a lot more than just tax laws -- social programs, pollution laws, etc. can all vary from one state to another. Imagine if California were dragged down by what Missouri is doing, or vice-versa.
|
I suppose we should think of one American state as being a bit like one European country, especially those with smaller populations such as Sweden. I don't think it would be appropriate for the whole of Europe to have the same tax system, especially considering the economic variations which exist.
But even Scotland has different tax laws, social programs, education system, healthcare system, pension system, welfare system, property regulations etc. from England. But then again, Scotland is essentially a country in its own right — no-one really believes that the perhaps somewhat ironically named United Kingdom is 'one single indivisible nation' anymore.
|
Walker
|
| Elaine wrote: | | I was being facetious. I usually do my friends' and family's taxes (for a small fee). Some of them are good at organizing their records, while others hand me piles of crumpled paper with indecipherable scribble, in between receipts for beauty parlors, dog grooming, dry cleaning, etc... and they don't even own a business! They leave it to me to sort things out and figure out what forms they need to submit. |
Lucky for them to have you! I wouldn't want to touch that stuff with a 39 ½ foot pole!
| Uriel wrote: | Hell no; that's the beauty of the US -- it's all different! If you don't like the laws or conditions in one state, you can move to another -- and one state isn't bound by what their neighbors are doing. This applies to a lot more than just tax laws -- social programs, pollution laws, etc. can all vary from one state to another. Imagine if California were dragged down by what Missouri is doing, or vice-versa.
States actually use their tax laws to entire businesses to relocate to them -- dinky states like Delaware advertise themselves as tax havens, for instance. Not unlike what some countries do. And my former employer at the local sports arena was always having to compete with a similar one in El Paso -- made more of a headache because NM charges gross receipts tax on ticket sales, whereas Texas does not; which meant other numbers had to be juggled to satisfy Santa Fe's requirements but also keep our bid competitive with our neighbor down the freeway. |
I reckon that's an advantage, that if you're dissatisfied you can move to another state. Weird, your nation is split up in many aspects and yet it seems so united! So what is Missouri doing? I picture it as a real Redneck Land.
| Benjamin wrote: | | I suppose we should think of one American state as being a bit like one European country, especially those with smaller populations such as Sweden. I don't think it would be appropriate for the whole of Europe to have the same tax system, especially considering the economic variations which exist. |
Whoa, let's not get ahead of ourselves here! The American states are states -- the countries of Europe are countries. Sweden is a country. They haven't made a whore out of us quite yet!
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Walker wrote: | | I reckon that's an advantage, that if you're dissatisfied you can move to another state. |
Also an advantage of the European Union. If I wanted, I could get on the train to France tomorrow and never come back.
| Benjamin wrote: | | Whoa, let's not get ahead of ourselves here! The American states are states -- the countries of Europe are countries. Sweden is a country. They haven't made a whore out of us quite yet! |
But it's still comparable in terms of scale. Yes, although technically when someone from from Massachusetts goes to Arizona, they are still in 'the same country', from our (European) perspective it probably wouldn't really feel like it. Essentially, I don't think that it is appropriate to compare the United States as a whole to individual European countries, with the possible exception of Russia.
|
Walker
|
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | I reckon that's an advantage, that if you're dissatisfied you can move to another state. |
Also an advantage of the European Union. If I wanted, I could get on the train to France tomorrow and never come back. |
Yes, but would you? I wouldn't because I wouldn't have a clue what people there were saying, nor would I be able to read any papers or signs or directions.
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Whoa, let's not get ahead of ourselves here! The American states are states -- the countries of Europe are countries. Sweden is a country. They haven't made a whore out of us quite yet! |
But it's still comparable in terms of scale. Yes, although technically when someone from from Massachusetts goes to Arizona, they are still in 'the same country', from our (European) perspective it probably wouldn't really feel like it. Essentially, I don't think that it is appropriate to compare the United States as a whole to individual European countries, with the possible exception of Russia. |
Maybe it wouldn't, but at least they speak the same language in Massachusetts and Arizona. Furthermore, they have the same national flag and they salute the same President. We don't. You're probably right that it's not appropriate to compare the US. as a whole to European countries, but it'd be just as inappropriate to compare the US. as a whole to the European Union.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Walker wrote: | | Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | I reckon that's an advantage, that if you're dissatisfied you can move to another state. |
Also an advantage of the European Union. If I wanted, I could get on the train to France tomorrow and never come back. |
Yes, but would you? |
People do. There are literally millions of people from other EU countries living in Britain at the moment, and probably vice versa. Although admittedly I'd imagine that most internal EU migrants intend to return to their original country eventually (I don't know if that's also the case for internal migration in the US).
| Walker wrote: | | I wouldn't have a clue what people there were saying, nor would I be able to read any papers or signs or directions. |
Well I actually would if I went to France, because I can (more or less) speak French. But in your case, you could replace France with either Britain or Ireland, and it still works. Of course, you might not want to move to Britain/Ireland for the rest of your life, but the option is very much there if you did.
| Walker wrote: | | Maybe it wouldn't, but at least they speak the same language in Massachusetts and Arizona. |
They might speak the same language, but that doesn't necessarily mean that those two states are socially and economically very similar. (I really don't know if they are or not, because I don't know much about the United States at all).
| Walker wrote: | | Furthermore, they have the same national flag and they salute the same President. We don't. |
But this is superficial. And what's more, in Birmingham I see the EU flag much more often than I see either the English or British flags anyway.
|
Uriel
|
| Quote: | | So what is Missouri doing? I picture it as a real Redneck Land. |
I have no idea what goes on in Missouri; I know absolutely nothing about the place. It's sort of in that transition zone between the South and the Midwest, but I suppose I think of it as mainly midwestern. But I really couldn't tell you much about it other than as the "Show-Me State" it's known for its skeptics. ("I'm from Missouri, so you'll have to show me.")
| Quote: | | They might speak the same language, but that doesn't necessarily mean that those two states are socially and economically very similar. |
Massachusetts is a relatively liberal northeastern state with a temperate, maritime climate and Arizona is a relatively conservative southwestern state with a hot desert climate. Both have a good number of fairly wealthy residents. I would say they are pretty dissimilar in many ways, although not truly at the level of being different countries, of course.
| Quote: | | I reckon that's an advantage, that if you're dissatisfied you can move to another state. Weird, your nation is split up in many aspects and yet it seems so united! |
The US was originally intended to be a much looser federation than it has actually become, so some of the variations in state laws reflect that early political experiment, while much of the cohesion that you see across the country is a reflection of the later evolution of things.
About 40 million Americans move every year. Over half simply relocate within the same county, but 20% move to a new state. Jobs and the desire to buy a house are the main driving forces. United Van Lines, a nationwide moving company, tracks where they move their customers to, and the majority of interstate moves are out of the east and to the west. The South gets a lot of incoming, as well.
Of course, that's just a reflection of one company's findings within their own clientele.
Missouri is the state marked MO, by the way; near the middle of the country, right above AR (Arkansas) and just west of IL (Illinois). Some of the residents call it Mizurry and some call it Mizurrah.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Uriel wrote: | | right above AR (Arkansas) |
Incidentally, I used to think that Arkansas was pronounced 'are Kansas' until the other day.
|
Walker
|
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | I reckon that's an advantage, that if you're dissatisfied you can move to another state. |
Also an advantage of the European Union. If I wanted, I could get on the train to France tomorrow and never come back. |
Yes, but would you? |
People do. There are literally millions of people from other EU countries living in Britain at the moment, and probably vice versa. Although admittedly I'd imagine that most internal EU migrants intend to return to their original country eventually (I don't know if that's also the case for internal migration in the US). |
That's true. Many young people go abroad (to another EU countries) to live and work for a while.
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | I wouldn't have a clue what people there were saying, nor would I be able to read any papers or signs or directions. |
Well I actually would if I went to France, because I can (more or less) speak French. But in your case, you could replace France with either Britain or Ireland, and it still works. Of course, you might not want to move to Britain/Ireland for the rest of your life, but the option is very much there if you did. |
Aye, it is!
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Maybe it wouldn't, but at least they speak the same language in Massachusetts and Arizona. |
They might speak the same language, but that doesn't necessarily mean that those two states are socially and economically very similar. (I really don't know if they are or not, because I don't know much about the United States at all). |
As Uriel said, they aren't very similar. But a great unity factor, as I see it, is sharing the same language.
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | Furthermore, they have the same national flag and they salute the same President. We don't. |
But this is superficial. And what's more, in Birmingham I see the EU flag much more often than I see either the English or British flags anyway. |
It is superficial, but it's also official. Sure, the EU flag is also official but it's not a national flag; it's not something you can identify with. To me it represents something that's pretty abstract and far away, and it means nothing to me. I rarely see it and that doesn't sadden me.
|
Walker
|
Uriel, if you read my signature you'll see that I don't have time to comment on your post now. Sorry, gotta split!
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Walker wrote: | | As Uriel said, they aren't very similar. But a great unity factor, as I see it, is sharing the same language. |
That's interesting. I can see that, from a Swedish perspective, the country = language equation would make a lot of sense, since (with the exception of a minority of people in Finland plus Aland), Sweden is essentially the only Swedish-speaking country, and Swedish is by far the dominant language in Sweden (it certainly isn't a bilingual country, for example).
However, on the one hand, that would make a lot less sense to someone from, say, Belgium, Luxembourg or Switzerland, where the concept of 'one language' may not automatically be associated with the concept of 'one country'.
On the other hand, that also makes a lot less sense to people from the British Isles. Even though the vast majority of people in Ireland were (and still are) primarily English-speaking in the 1920s, that didn't stop them from demanding independence — speaking the same language did not seem provide many Irish people a sense of unity with the British at that time. Likewise, the current movement in favour of Scottish independence is not linguistically motivated — speaking English (for the most part) does not really seem to encourage people to want to remain part of the same country in this case. It thus seems very plausible that there may eventually be at least three independent and primarily English-speaking countries in Northwest Europe in my lifetime, all right next to each-other.
| Benjamin wrote: | | It is superficial, but it's also official. Sure, the EU flag is also official but it's not a national flag; it's not something you can identify with. To me it represents something that's pretty abstract and far away, and it means nothing to me. I rarely see it and that doesn't sadden me. |
I actually identify with the EU flag far more than with either the British or English flags. I associate the British and English flags with far-right groups such as the British National Party, and thus with racism. Additionally, I associate particularly the British flag with imperialism — which to me means bigotry, jingoism and greed — and I feel sick every time I see it.
Of course, when I move to Scotland later this year, I may be able to identify with the Scottish flag, because it doesn't really have any negative connotations.
|
Uriel
|
Well, if I go to Canada, they also speak English -- and pretty much with the same accent that I have. So, on the one hand you can make the point that simply sharing the English language isn't enough to foster unity -- but at the same time, if I go to Canada and hear familiar voices, it doesn't really "feel" foreign (despite the many difference between our two countries) -- whereas England or Australia, with their very different accents and intonations, would feel foreign and different.
If you're a GenAm speaker like me, you can get a little preview of that feeling by going to the South or to New England, where accents are very different than the national "norm" -- and in the South, there are even subtle but significant cultural differences (not so much in NE).
Beware of accent fatigue when you go to Scotland, Benjamin -- no matter how much you like a given accent or how cute or interesting you find it, after a few weeks you'll reach a point where you just cover your ears for a split second and wish mightily that you could just hear someone talking "normally" for five frickin' minutes! Happened to me in England....
|
Deborah
|
| Uriel wrote: | Beware of accent fatigue when you go to Scotland, Benjamin -- no matter how much you like a given accent or how cute or interesting you find it, after a few weeks you'll reach a point where you just cover your ears for a split second and wish mightily that you could just hear someone talking "normally" for five frickin' minutes! Happened to me in England....  |
Hmm...maybe that's what was really going on in my subconscious, that time when I'd been in Europe for a couple of months and I suddenly heard a voice that I recognized as being from the SF Bay Area, even though I'd never before realized that we spoke any differently from all the other Americans who had general American accents.
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| Uriel wrote: | Beware of accent fatigue when you go to Scotland, Benjamin -- no matter how much you like a given accent or how cute or interesting you find it, after a few weeks you'll reach a point where you just cover your ears for a split second and wish mightily that you could just hear someone talking "normally" for five frickin' minutes! Happened to me in England....  |
I know what you mean. I heard someone from Scotland talking on the radio yesterday, and I actually found him very difficult to understand. I had to listen very carefully, and even then I probably only understood about 80% of it. Because it's not just their phonology and intonation that's different; they also have differences in vocabulary and word order.
|
Loic
|
Since this is also a clothes thread, would you buy any kilt to wear when you move to Scotland?
|
Yelina
|
I always dreamt to meet a young, handsome Scottish guy wearing a kilt, just to check if he's really naked under, as the myth says!
|
Benjamin [inactive]
|
| loic wrote: | | Since this is also a clothes thread, would you buy any kilt to wear when you move to Scotland? |
Yes, I suppose I would — if I could afford it, because they're individually made and are thus quite expensive. Although admittedly, kilts (along with tartans and bagpipes) are not universally popular amongst Scottish people, partly because they're traditionally a Highland thing, and partly because they can often seem a bit naff.
Incidentally, I ordered a Scottish passport cover yesterday. It actually looks very authentic, except that it's navy-blue, whereas all EU passports are burgundy-red.
|
Walker
|
| Uriel wrote: | | Of course, that's just a reflection of one company's findings within their own clientele. |
Interesting stuff, Uriel. Makes you think of all those immigrants who came to the East, the gateway, and then continued westwards.
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | As Uriel said, they aren't very similar. But a great unity factor, as I see it, is sharing the same language. |
That's interesting. I can see that, from a Swedish perspective, the country = language equation would make a lot of sense, since (with the exception of a minority of people in Finland plus Aland), Sweden is essentially the only Swedish-speaking country, and Swedish is by far the dominant language in Sweden (it certainly isn't a bilingual country, for example).
However, on the one hand, that would make a lot less sense to someone from, say, Belgium, Luxembourg or Switzerland, where the concept of 'one language' may not automatically be associated with the concept of 'one country'. |
I'm sure you're right about that. They don't have one main language in those countries, respectively.
| Benjamin wrote: | | On the other hand, that also makes a lot less sense to people from the British Isles. Even though the vast majority of people in Ireland were (and still are) primarily English-speaking in the 1920s, that didn't stop them from demanding independence — speaking the same language did not seem provide many Irish people a sense of unity with the British at that time. |
They wanted their country to be their own country. Why wouldn't they want that?
| Benjamin wrote: | | Likewise, the current movement in favour of Scottish independence is not linguistically motivated — speaking English (for the most part) does not really seem to encourage people to want to remain part of the same country in this case. |
Same as above, except you put it in the present tense.
| Benjamin wrote: | | It thus seems very plausible that there may eventually be at least three independent and primarily English-speaking countries in Northwest Europe in my lifetime, all right next to each-other. |
That's something! Three independent countries!
I don't necessarily mean that sharing the same language between countries is a unity factor, but speaking (mainly) one language in one specific country is or ought to be. I'm not saying that say, Ireland and England ought to be united because English is the main language in both countries. Why should they be, they're two different countries! I'm talking about unity through language within countries.
| Benjamin wrote: | | Walker wrote: | | It is superficial, but it's also official. Sure, the EU flag is also official but it's not a national flag; it's not something you can identify with. To me it represents something that's pretty abstract and far away, and it means nothing to me. I rarely see it and that doesn't sadden me. |
I actually identify with the EU flag far more than with either the British or English flags. I associate the British and English flags with far-right groups such as the British National Party, and thus with racism. Additionally, I associate particularly the British flag with imperialism — which to me means bigotry, jingoism and greed — and I feel sick every time I see it. |
Opening a history book or watching the news I think I see what you mean. Unfortunately, I partly associate the Swedish flag with racism, and that's because racists and nazis use it i.e. keep smearing shit on it. But I won't despise the flag even though mentioned f*cks do their best to make me despise it.
| Benjamin wrote: | | Of course, when I move to Scotland later this year, I may be able to identify with the Scottish flag, because it doesn't really have any negative connotations. |
Maybe you will.
|
Porthos
|
| Yelina wrote: | I always dreamt to meet a young, handsome Scottish guy wearing a kilt, just to check if he's really naked under, as the myth says!  |
In my punk rock phase in Junior High, I used to wear a kilt and go naked underneath to school. lol
|
Yelina
|
Wow!!
You shouldn't have told me! Now, I'm going to imagine this
Just a question, what did you feel? I mean, didn't you feel as if something missed? I don't think I could wear a skirt without any underwear below. I wouldn't feel at ease.
|
Fredrik
|
Interesting discussion here (about nations and states, no offence to the thrilling kilt with no underpants discussion! )
I don't really equate language and nation either, as there have been/are vicious language battles within Norway (Bokmål vs. Nynorsk) and I can understand more of a Swedish or Danish radio broadcast than the 80 % Benjamin mentioned that he could understand from a Scottish radio broadcast. Hearing Swedish is just like another Norwegian dialect. Because of Nordic co-operation and EES (= EU + EFTA) I can easily move to Sweden or Denmark and it would probably not be more exotic or difficult than Benjamin's move from England to Scotland or a move from New England to New Mexico.
|
|
|
|