Daily, some people die in different parts of the world just because of the lack of organ donations.
I don't know how this issue is handled in your country, but in France, people are not informed well enough. We do not have advertising campaigns or when we have some, it's just 2 days a year. It's far from being sufficient to call up the population. I'm convinced that the government should more imply itself to gather people when they are still alive. Indeed, the decision of giving his/her organs must be thought when people are in good fit because when they're dead, the families seldom agree to give organs. Despite the fact that I clearly understand their situation, I find it a pity to deprive some people of life whereas the organs of the dead person are going to rot into the ground or disappear in ashes.
As far as I'm concerned, I already told my family that I want to donate my organs. I like helping people, so, if I can still do it at the time of my death, then, I'd leave happy.
This problem also occurs with blood donations. But fortunately, for about one year, more people agree to give their blood (at least in France). The slight increase is a good thing, but it's still not enough.
What do you think about organ/blood donations? Are you in favor of or against?
Pauline
Yes I agree that it's wonderful to give your organs to help other people. I've told as well that I want to do this.
i wanted to give blood in the hospital but they didn't take some because if you take medications it will be in your blood, and this will be on the list of reasons why they don't take your blood for transfusion or other things. I told them then I wouldn't take the medicatiosn during for example one week, so I can give blood, but they replied that it's not allowed that they take the blood from someone who does this.
I suppse that the organs it's not a problem; the most important is that your organs are healthy. I think that mine are very well, so they can take them after I will die. When you're dead you don't use your human body; your soul get separated so for sure you can give your liver, kidney, eyes, heart etc... to another person without the risk that the person would steal somethings from you, or you would get those feelings/thoughts of those people. It's a quite difficult thing to understand, because for example the priest told me that after someone you love dies, they live forever in your heart - so, if your heart would be transplanted to another person would you lose the eternity of the person, would this transfer to the destinary of the heart? I'm not sure what to think about this. I hope that all such personal things would go to the soul when you die, so the organs would be not more connected with you, but like objects then to develop the feelings, thoughts etc..of the person who will receive them.
i like helping people as well, so although somethings (like what I've written, but other things as well) aren't to undertsnad, I would like to donate my organs.
Porthos
I would donate my organs, but I always worry that some rich and powerful person might have me "whacked" in order to get an organ he/she desperately needs.
Deborah
I have the little pink dot on my driver's license that indicates that when I die, my body is to be used for whatever good can be got from it, whether it's recyling organs or slicing it up for teaching purposes. BTW, is that little pink dot just a California thing, or do all the states use it?
Yelina
Deborah wrote:
I have the little pink dot on my driver's license that indicates that when I die, my body is to be used for whatever good can be got from it, whether it's recyling organs or slicing it up for teaching purposes. BTW, is that little pink dot just a California thing, or do all the states use it?
I didn't know about the pink dot, but I find it a very good idea. I think if it's just used in California, then, other states should integrate it. It may be a good idea to suggest to our next President!
Yelina
Porthos wrote:
I would donate my organs, but I always worry that some rich and powerful person might have me "whacked" in order to get an organ he/she desperately needs.
I don't worry about such a thing as it's very unlikely that it happens. I think that if rich and powerful people needed organs, they'd corrupt a surgeon in order to have them before other people, even if they're not priority.
Walker
I don't think we're very well informed about organ donation here either. I have no idea how many people here are willing to donate their bodies/organs when they die. And I'm not really sure what I'd want myself.
I read today that there are several hospitals in Sweden where doctors keep from pulling the plug on almost brain-dead patients whom they know won't survive, until they are brain-dead, so that they can pick whatever organs they need from those patients once they're completely dead. So, they keep them "alive" so that they can use them as a toolbox later on. It's called elective ventilation. Several transplantation units work actively to make nursing staff apply elective ventilation without contacting their manager first, even though it's illegal. However, the authorities are now looking into it.
This is pretty amazing:
It's not a rubber dummy but a man holding his own skin. Last week at work I was talking to a co-worker and I said a couple of lines from Flesh For Frankenstein.
-When I was studying under professor Blümberg and Frenks, we had to wipe ze floors for two years before I could stick my nose into ze laboratory!
-But, Baron, you know I believe in your work! Ve've vorked so hard togezer. Ve did everything in ze laboratory and I'm so graseful to you that I could do that.
-I know, I know, Otto. You've been a very good assistant. And you brought in some good parts. That manos was perfect.
-Thank you, Baron.
-But what we weally need now is a perfect... nasum!
We carried on joking for a bit and he said that it's a shame there aren't any of those people in the real world, but only in the movies, but added that maybe they're just good at hiding. Then, the other day as I was getting rid of a couple of slow minutes at work I came across an article in Aftonbladet (daily paper) that made my sleepy eyes widen a little. The article was about Gunther von Hagens and he seemed to meet all the criteria:
1, he's an anatomist.
2, he's German.
3, he's excentric.
Check it out for yourselves! -> Body Worlds. His biography on Wikipedia begins with the following words:
Quote:
Gunther von Hagens (b. Gunther Liebchen, January 10, 1945) is a controversial German anatomist who invented the plastination technique to preserve specimen and is heavily involved in its promotion. He developed the Body Worlds exhibition of human bodies and body parts. Von Hagens has a distinct German accent, and wears a black hat during his instructional cadaver dissection videos.
Lazar
I saw Body Worlds when it was at the Boston Science Museum a few months ago. They had some really fascinating stuff there.
Walker
Lazar wrote:
I saw Body Worlds when it was at the Boston Science Museum a few months ago. They had some really fascinating stuff there.
No shit? That must've been awesome! How close to the exibits were you allowed to get?
Joanne
Lazar wrote:
I saw Body Worlds when it was at the Boston Science Museum a few months ago. They had some really fascinating stuff there.
I saw Bodies - The Exhibition in New York last November. My friend had to see the exhibition for a lab assignment in her anatomy class, and asked me to tag along, since it was close to my workplace and she didn't know her way around the area.
Walker wrote:
No shit? That must've been awesome! How close to the exibits were you allowed to get?
I don't know about Body Worlds, but there were no partitions around the figures in Bodies - The Exhibition. Guests were allowed to get as close to the bodies as they could, without touching them.
Lazar
Walker wrote:
No shit? That must've been awesome! How close to the exibits were you allowed to get?
As in Joanne's case, there were no partitions, and we could get as close to the bodies as we could without touching them. It was really cool. They had people doing a wide range of activties - dancing, playing soccer, all sorts of stuff. They even had a goat and a camel on display.
Uriel
I think most or all US states have the organ donation dot on their drivers licenses. It's on my NM one. Sadly, car wreck victims usually make the best donators -- they're generally in good health, with no major disease processes destroying their tissues (as opposed to sick people who are already in the hospital), and many of their organs will escape major trauma from the wreck. Plus, many accidents happen because people in the prime of their lives are simply driving recklessly, so their organs will last a long time in a new body!
My mother's cousin died of an aneurysm and was parted out to at least four different people -- it made the newspaper because there wasn't a lot of organ donation in the south at the time (about 20 years ago). I think it's a lot more common now.
Just try not to die of rabies and then donate your organs, like that one guy ... three people died of rabies after receiving his parts! (It's just not a disease that gets screened for regularly, and it can only be diagnosed from brain tissue! No one knew that that was what he had died from until it was too late....)
And Porthos, try not to let those silly urban legends get to you -- you have to be carefully matched to any potential recipient for your organs to do them any good. So it ain't some rich stranger you need to watch out for -- it's more likely to be a close relative!
Yelina
Uriel wrote:
I think most or all US states have the organ donation dot on their drivers licenses. It's on my NM one. Sadly, car wreck victims usually make the best donators -- they're generally in good health, with no major disease processes destroying their tissues (as opposed to sick people who are already in the hospital), and many of their organs will escape major trauma from the wreck. Plus, many accidents happen because people in the prime of their lives are simply driving recklessly, so their organs will last a long time in a new body!
I find it a good thing that US States implement the organ donation dot one the driving lisenses. I'm really convinced all countries should proceed similarly.
You're totally right when you say car wreck victims are the best donators. That's why (in countries which do not apply the "dot-system") people should know more about this alternative of organ donations so that they could express their wish of donating or not before being too late.
Sometimes, people do not need to be dead to give an organ. A friend of mine gave one of his kidneys to his brother. It was a love action which led to his dismissal at work.
The risk incured with a tranplantation is the rejection of the new organ in the recipient body. The people who suffer this must feel low in spirits.
Uriel
One of my friends who had his leg mangled in a workplace accident with a forklift is having a cadaver heel implanted in his foot (his own heel necrosed and could not be saved, and he requires an expensive brace to walk properly). I would have to think long and hard before going that route and having to take anti-rejection drugs for the rest of my life -- he's only in his late twenties, I believe. But at one point he was considering having it amputated altogether due to the chronic pain, so I think any decision he makes is going to be a drastic one.
Elaine
Joanne wrote:
I saw Bodies - The Exhibition in New York last November. My friend had to see the exhibition for a lab assignment in her anatomy class, and asked me to tag along, since it was close to my workplace and she didn't know her way around the area.
I read somewhere that the Dalian Medical School that does that whole plastination thing for "Bodies" uses the corpses of executed Chinese prisoners. Don't know if that's true or not, but just the thought of it creeps me out.