What European countries have the best football teams?
As an American, I don't know much about football (soccer). What are some of the leading national teams? And for those of you who are big football fans, could you rank the top teams in order of best to worst? Of course, I expect the unforunate but unavoidable personal biases.
Loic
There is no need to have our personal preferences mixed up in the rankings for FIFA provide us with a monthly update with respect to where a country stands.
Here are the top 20 rankings as of October 2006:
1. Brazil
2. Italy
3. France
4. Argentina
5. England
6. Germany
7. Netherlands
8. Czech Republic
9. Portugal
10. Spain
11. Nigeria
12. Camerouen
13. Ukraine
14. Greece
15. Switzerland
16. Sweden
17. Uruguay
18. Cote d'Ivoire
19. Mexico and Croatia
The newer system of ranking is deemed to be fairer as it takes into account the relative strength of the opposing team when it comes to international matches. Under the old system where a win against say, Wales is almost as valuable as victory against Brazil, countries which regularly play against vastly inferior teams stand to gain plenty of points and rise up the table.
In fact, the USA were ranked 5th prior to the start of the World Cup in June. They are now out of the top 20.
Sander
loic wrote:
6. Germany
7. Netherlands
Porthos
As an American, who is not all that interested in soccer, but occasionally watches international competitions, I usually root for the following Euro teams, in order.
Spain/Wales
Ireland
England
Italy
Portugal
And then, after that, I really don't care. The top pick is basically just because that is where my ancestors are from. Sounds korny and sentimental, I know, but that's just me.
Loic
Spain are perennial under-performers at the world stage. Many pundits tipped Spain to go all the way this summer, but they fell at the knock-out stage to France. These same pundits are now beginning to wildly speculate that it is the fractious identity of Spain that is at the root of their trouble. Split Spain into different home countries ŕ la the United Kingdom, the regionalists exhort.
So in the (unlikely) event that Spain devolves into Catalonia, Castille, Galicia, Andalusia, etc in world football, you have to actually sit down and choose a Spanish team to support now.
This means more homework for you to do - which part of Spain did your forebears actually hail from?
Porthos
Exactly. That would require effort, something I'm not willing to do.
fab
It not by chauvinism, but I'll say France. Even if we lost to Italy in the final of the world cup we played better.
fab
It not by chauvinism, but I'll say France. Even if we lost to Italy in the final of the world cup we played better. after I'll say Italy and Germany.
Loic
Which club do you support, Fab? Is it PSG?
fab
I don't support any club, since I'm not a big Football fan. I only follow the big events such as Euro and world cup.
Irrintzi
The best club is the Olympique de Marseille!
Allez l'OM!!
Akoni
loic wrote:
6. Germany
7. Netherlands
Netherlands for the win!
Icke
Akoni wrote:
loic wrote:
6. Germany
7. Netherlands
Netherlands for the win!
Hehehe, good old dutch-german football rivalry
Pauline
LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Klasse !!
Shouga
Pauline wrote:
LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Klasse !!
Great picture lol! - Klasse indeed!
Akoni
hehe
Liz
What European countries have the best football teams?
Not Hungary for sure. Not any more.
Loic
I know quite a bit of Hungarian football's illustrious history and their dominance of the game especially in the 50s. It is a pity that you don't see them much in the World Cup or the European games nowadays - how the mighty have fallen.
The only Hungarian footballer I know is Ferenc Puskás and he played for Real Madrid! Is he something of a sporting icon in Hungary?
And Liz, do you support any German club since you are now based in Germany? Do you know that Franck Ribery is poised to join Bayern Munich for the next season?
I suppose Irrintz would mourn that decision since Ribery is currently at Marseille.
Loic
I know it's a bit spastic to extend my congratulations at such a late hour, but just in case you still don't know, AC Milan have won their 7th European Cup title on Wednesday evening at Athens.
I hope I wasn't the only bloke in this forum to have watched the showdown between Liverpool and Milan. Even for those who didn't watch the match in its entire 93 minutes (that includes extra time), you must have watched the highlights. Pippo Inzaghi deflecting a free kick off Pirlo that wrong-footed Pepe Reina. Kaka releasing Inzaghi from the offside trap who calmly slotted the ball past the body of the dispairing Reina.
For a man whom Sir Alex Fergueson once sniffily dismissed as "being born offside", Filippo Inzaghi did his job very well by poaching chances when they should not even had been there.
For those who remembered the final in the sultry night of Istanbul two years ago, it was the same clash but with a different outcome. In 2005, AC Milan were 3-0 up by half-time but Liverpool clawed back to a 3-3 draw in a space of 6 minutes before winning the Champions League in a penalty shootout. Jerzy Dudek was the hero of Istanbul that night when he famously saved the penalty kick of Shevchenko.
But alas, miracles do not happen twice and I am awfully glad that the Spanish-English outfit that is Liverpool would return back to Merseyside emptyhanded.
Forza Milan!
I am rich I am handsome I am the playmaker I am Kaka
Liz
loic wrote:
I know quite a bit of Hungarian football's illustrious history and their dominance of the game especially in the 50s. It is a pity that you don't see them much in the World Cup or the European games nowadays - how the mighty have fallen..
Unfortunately, we don't have a good enough football team to take part in the World Cup or any other important games.
Yes, Hungarian football enjoyed its heyday during the 1950s, thanks to the otherwise abominable communist regime. Among the only few advantages of the regime was the fact that sports, including football were supported and encouraged by the government. A sports career was an excellent chance for poor and socially disadvantaged people to get out of misery.
Nowadays, it is quite different. Football is mostly about money and corruption. The most well known Hungarian football club, Ferencváros is experiencing moral and financial crisis, which is partly due to financial fiasco, partly to drunk and disorderly fans. They have caused outrage in the past few years by provoking and beating up supporters of other clubs. A considerable number of those unruly supporters were/are neonazi buggers. Look at this (as I'm not really au fait with current issues concerning football, I'm not sure how accurate these pieces of information are): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferencv%C3%A1rosi_TC
loic wrote:
The only Hungarian footballer I know is Ferenc Puskás and he played for Real Madrid! Is he something of a sporting icon in Hungary?
Yes, he definitely is. He was a living legend...unfortunately, we lost him this year, so he is a true legend now, in every sense of the word. Some programmes were dedicated to him on the BBC as well, as he was world famous. Besides, he is said to have been a very agreeable sort of person, too.
loic wrote:
And Liz, do you support any German club since you are now based in Germany? Do you know that Franck Ribery is poised to join Bayern Munich for the next season?
Oh...sorry to disappoint you but I've never been a great supporter of any football team. I like playing football for fun but I don't particularly enjoy watching it. Mind you, I do watch some of the important games but I'm not genuinely enthusiastic about it.
Deborah
Liz wrote:
Yes, Hungarian football enjoyed its heyday during the 1950s, thanks to the otherwise abominable communist regime. Among the only few advantages of the regime was the fact that sports, including football were supported and encouraged by the government. A sports career was an excellent chance for poor and socially disadvantaged people to get out of misery.
One of my dance teachers started out in football in Hungary. I'm not sure how he got into ballet, but he was a natural, and -- I believe -- part of his decision was due to the fact that if you were in a dance company, you traveled outside the country a lot. Eventually he defected.
Liz
Deborah wrote:
One of my dance teachers started out in football in Hungary. I'm not sure how he got into ballet, but he was a natural, and -- I believe -- part of his decision was due to the fact that if you were in a dance company, you traveled outside the country a lot. Eventually he defected.
Exactly. That was another advantage of pursuing a sports career. Otherwise you couldn't just keep travelling about whenever and wherever you wanted to. There were two types of passport back then: a blue and a red one. If you had a red passport, you could travel to communist countries only. It was rather cumbersome to get a blue passport, which enabled you to travel to "western" countries as well. What's more, it wasn't possible to travel every year and your actions were closely monitored.
(I hope I'm not mixing up the functions of the two passports - logically, it was the way I described above but I'm not 100% sure... )
Ironically, our "capitalist" but non-EU blue passports have been replaced by red (!) EU passports!
That was just a side note...let's not veer away from the actual topic. (I'm telling it to myself all the time, in vain... )
Liz
loic wrote:
I am rich
I am handsome
I am the playmaker
I am Kaka
Loic, I like your succint characterisation of Kaka...I was wondering if you were being slightly tongue-in-cheek there...
Kaka is one of my favourite footballers...as far as his name is concerned. "Kaka" means "shit" in Hungarian. However, there is a subtle stylistic difference between the Hungarian and the English word. "Kaka" is informal and used quite often by parents in front of children, whereas "shit" is widely considered a vulgarism.
Now, you can imagine how much gobsmacked the entire population of Hungary was at hearing Kaka's name for the first time...
Loic
Lol. I didn't kaka is a form of mild expletive in Hungarian.
In Malay, Kaka means sister. But well, since Malay is far from being my mother tongue, I never make such an association whenever I see him.
Do you admire him? I must admit that I am fairly indifferent to the Brazilian playmaker. The reason why I came up with that little ditty was a reflection of one of my (female) friend's opinion towards him. Whenever Kaka loses possession of the ball (pretty rare occurrence, by the way), she'd gush dreamily, 'Oh, don't worry! You're handsome.'
Of course, she had no such sympathy for Gattuso, the AC Milan winger. But she'd contradict herself by going on to state that AC Milan has the 'most handsome starting XI' in the world.
Maybe. But that's not what football is all about, isn't it? If that is so, where would the likes of Wayne Rooney stand?
Liz
loic wrote:
Lol. I didn't kaka is a form of mild expletive in Hungarian.
Well, actually, it isn't an expletive as it isn't used to express the meaning of "shit" as an exclamation, that is, you can't normally say "Kaka!". It merely refers to the product of defecation.
loic wrote:
Do you admire him?
No, I'm quite indifferent towards him, too. I just like his name.
Quite frankly, I've never been enthusiastic about women's idols, unlike most of my female acquintances.
loic wrote:
Maybe. But that's not what football is all about, isn't it?
No, not by any stretch of the imagination. To be more precise, it *shouldn't* be about that. However, if it weren't for those handsome blokes, most women wouldn't even have a passing interest in football.
Loic
According to a wholly unscientific observation, these footballers seem to be highly fancied by their female spectators. Of course, they are not purely glamour boys with long eyelashes, the male Anna Kournikovas of football. But one does get the impression that their popularity off the pitch is not commensurate with their abilities on the pitch.
1. David Beckham. Rumours have it that he's on the Queen's Honours List and who knows, the hallowed words of 'Arise, Sir David' might soon be uttered by the Queen herself.
2. Cristiano Ronaldo. I personally despise him. A show-pony and nothing more. But a very talented show-pony, I must admit.
3. Ricardo Izecson dos Santos Leite aka Kaká. Attacking midfielder. King playmaker. Indispensable to AC Milan. A jewel in the glittering crown of the Brazilian squad.
4. Nakata. Has hung up his boots since the last world cup. I don't really understand the attraction, but he does tend to dress in a very sharp manner. But if you consider that he spent a good bit of his footballing career with AS Roma, you might understand where his fashion sense came from.
5. Raul Gonzalez. Iconic captain of Real Madrid. Now, I can really understand why this bloke is an immensely popular figure. Girls are always gushing on how he kisses his wedding ring after scoring a goal. Awww...how sickeningly sweet.
Loic
But to me, they are the eternal heroes who would never die.
1. Zidane
2. Luis Figo
3. Robbie Fowler. Ok, so he's not exactly in the same league as the above two. But when I first started following English football at 9, he had just made his debut for Liverpool. Over the years, his reputation at Anfield has ensured that he remains 'The God' to his most ardent supporters.
And yes, I tentatively started out supporting Liverpool. I later switched allegiances, but my loyalty to Fowler has never wavered.
Liz
Wow Loic! You might as well work for those women's glossy magazines. You write rather passionately about womanisers disguised as footballers.
Your style verges on irony, which is typical of the aforementioned magazines, too. However, I think they do mean what they write, so what they write is plain kitsch as opposed to your descriptions, which clearly involve irony, I reckon.
Yes, you're right...these guys are immensely popular with women in general. I racked my brain but I couldn't really find a women's idol Hungarian footballer. However, we must have some despite our lack of football culture nowadays. But, in fact, here women tend to idolise the guys mentioned by you.
As for David Beckham, HE IS A TRAITOR!!! Leaving Manchester United to its own devices, eh?
A music teacher in our English partner school was crazy about David Beckham. We once visited the MU stadium and we had the chance of spending some time in the dressing room as well. Of course, we couldn't take a deep breath of the sweet fragrance of perspiration left behind by those modern knights, to the greatest disappointment of many girls. One classmate of mine took a sit on the same bank where the divine David used to get rid of his seemingly superfluous clothes. When we were informed on that, the teacher (female, of course) screamed with exultation: "Don't wash your jeans anymore!" Being an ardent MU supporter, she must be rather dissapointed by Beckham now. Or has she been just a Beckham fan and is now supporting Real Madrid?
I don't know but I find this exaggerated enthusiasm sort of pathetic...
Loic
David Beckham is immensely popular in Asia and his star has yet to wane despite a noticeabe lose of speed on the pitch. Every serious football pundit (read: every other male, in other words) can tell you that Beckham is a vastly overrated footballer and it is a testimony to the superb marketing efforts of his agent that Brand Beckham is so enduring today.
Actually, Beckham is not quite a Judas. He was compelled to leave Old Trafford under inauspicious circumstances (Remember the 'Flying Boot' incident?). Sir Alex Fergueson started to take a dim view of his off pitch activities and feared that his glamorous lifestyle would soon take a toll on team morale. He promptly shipped him off to Spain at the earliest available opportunity. The original deal was for Man Utd to sell him to Barcelona; Joan Laporta, Barca's presidential candidate at that time actually made the purchase of Beckham the central theme of his campaign.
Beckham demurred and opted for Real Madrid. A spurned Barca snapped up Ronaldinho from PSG instead. The rest, as they say, is history. Real Madrid has endured one of their worst slumps in history while their Catalan rivals have won the last two Spanish league titles as well as the Champions League last season.
I wouldn't really fancy myself working for women's magazines unless I get to be the editor and I am surrounded by a bevy of women with hair as glossy as the coverpage of the magazines. I'd really love to work for the print equivalent of soccernet or cricinfo, the Internet bibles of football and cricket respectively. Imagine being asked to work for Wisden, even as a tea boy - I'd jump at such a prospect without being asked!
By the way, if there is anything I hate more than Chelsea, it is Manchester United. But I envy you nonetheless for having visited the Theatre of Dreams!
Since you're based in Germany now, what do you think of their golden boy Michael Ballack? Unfortunately, he isn't doing as well as he'd hoped at Chelsea.
Liz
loic wrote:
Actually, Beckham is not quite a Judas. He was compelled to leave Old Trafford under inauspicious circumstances (Remember the 'Flying Boot' incident?). Sir Alex Fergueson started to take a dim view of his off pitch activities and feared that his glamorous lifestyle would soon take a toll on team morale. He promptly shipped him off to Spain at the earliest available opportunity. The original deal was for Man Utd to sell him to Barcelona; Joan Laporta, Barca's presidential candidate at that time actually made the purchase of Beckham the central theme of his campaign.
Beckham demurred and opted for Real Madrid. A spurned Barca snapped up Ronaldinho from PSG instead. The rest, as they say, is history. Real Madrid has endured one of their worst slumps in history while their Catalan rivals have won the last two Spanish league titles as well as the Champions League last season.
Okay, mea maxima culpa. Thanks a bunch for enlightening me on that.
loic wrote:
I wouldn't really fancy myself working for women's magazines unless I get to be the editor and I am surrounded by a bevy of women with hair as glossy as the coverpage of the magazines. I'd really love to work for the print equivalent of soccernet or cricinfo, the Internet bibles of football and cricket respectively. Imagine being asked to work for Wisden, even as a tea boy - I'd jump at such a prospect without being asked!
Oh, I see... Yeah, for some unknown reasons, editors seem to be immensely popular with pretty young women even if they are old, fat and disgusting. But they have money afer all, and that might be a pull factor here.
I've never seen young, handsome editors (maybe you'll be the first one? ), but imagine how popular they could be...
To be perfectly honest, I don't know if you stood a good chance of getting this job as the editors of most women's magazines are women. Sorry to disappoint you anyway... But the tea boy job sounds like a good idea!
loic wrote:
By the way, if there is anything I hate more than Chelsea, it is Manchester United. But I envy you nonetheless for having visited the Theatre of Dreams!
It wasn't a big deal really but as it's widely considered the "Theatre of Dreams", it was (and I guess it still is) treated accordingly. We weren't even allowed to touch the grass! Absurd, isn't it?
loic wrote:
Since you're based in Germany now, what do you think of their golden boy Michael Ballack? Unfortunately, he isn't doing as well as he'd hoped at Chelsea.
Oh...Michael Bollocks...oops I mean Ballacks...sorry, just Ballack. Sorry, but this is my "routine" gut reaction on hearing/reading his name...
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, I'm not a football enthusiast by any stretch of the imagination. Therefore, it would be an understatement to claim that I'm not really conversant with current issues of football. Besides, I don't have TV here and consequently, I'm practically unable to watch the cups/games even if I have a burning desire for doing so.
So, what I know about Ballack is that he's quite big here, being considered a women's idol (or idle? ) and a brilliant player at the same time, nevertheless, strictly in this order. However, I also think that he is pretty much overrated and he can't really live up to his own presumed standards.
BTW, your eternal heroes are that of my granddad's, too!
Loic
Not to be unkind, but what do German women think of Oliver Kahn? Personally, I think he looks rather terrifying between the posts and any striker would have second thoughts about getting the ball past him, surely.
Quote:
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, I'm not a football enthusiast by any stretch of the imagination. Therefore, it would be an understatement to claim that I'm not really conversant with current issues of football. Besides, I don't have TV here and consequently, I'm practically unable to watch the cups/games even if I have a burning desire for doing so.
But you still know a fair bit - enough to spot the difference between bollocks and a Ballack, that's for sure. I wonder if Bayern Munich'd take him back - he does not seem to be thriving at Chelsea. To make a bad situation already worst, he is currently the best paid footballer in the English Premier League at 120,000 pounds per week. His colleague Andrei Shevchenko is also as well paid but with even a lower goal conversion rate.
When I think of how much he makes a year, I get insane with jealousy. But who can I blame but the insatiable demand of market forces?
Quote:
However, I also think that he is pretty much overrated and he can't really live up to his own presumed standards.
He is the sort of player who can only flourish if the manager ensures that the team plays together as a unit around him. He is not versatile enough to play second fiddle if the situation asks for it. But he is still Germany's only world class footballer after the international retirement of that incredible Bavarian hulk (read: Oliver Kahn).
Speaking of German footballers, what comes to mind when Bastian Schweinsteiger is mentioned? An odd surname, perhaps?
Quote:
BTW, your eternal heroes are that of my granddad's, too!
Then your grandfather is clearly a man who keeps up with the times! If your grandfather had come of age in the 1950s, he would probably have thought very highly of the likes of Raymond Kopa or the young and highly talented Just Fontaine. Of course, I am assuming that he'd also have lionised the Hungarian hero Ferenc Puskás. If because of the Puskás connection that he decided to support Real Madrid, he might also had been in thrall of the likes of the great Alfredo Di Stéfano .
Come the 1960s, your grandfather would be enthralled by the young swashbuckling Pelé, statistically the best footballer in the history of the sport. It is impossible to mention the talented Brazilian squad of the 1960s and 1970s without also introducing Garrincha, Zico, Socrates and Rivelino. They were gods and remain living deities.
In the 1970s, he might have cast an envious eye to the north and come to admire the superb touch of Germany's Gerd Mueller and of course, der Kaiser in Franz Beckebauer. In the Netherlands, Johan Cruijff would be making his mark at Ajax and later Barcelona. Cruijff epitomised the style of 'Totaal Voetball' that the Dutch team would be so famous for - football at its attacking best, no punches pulled back. In fact, it would be hard to say who was better - Beckenbauer or Cruijff. Both of their technical abilities were sublime and both of them had excellent vision based on an acute ability to position themselves on the pitch as the attack unfolded.
And as the years roll by, your grandfather would probably have pined for the old footballing titans of yore instead of searching for new stars to lionise. Maybe Michel Platini would have awakened his senses in the 1980s. Diego Maradona's outrageous 'Hand of God' and his later one man effort in scoring the second goal (he started off in the Argentine's own half and dribbled the ball past five English players before slotting the ball past the hapless Peter Shilton) would certainly have captured his imagination and renewed his faith in the best sport of the world that is football.
There were a plethora of giants in the 1990s and your grandfather would have been a bit too confused to select his international starting IX if given a chance. But if what you said were true, then he'd have picked Zidane, Figo and Fowler. Yes, my current batch of heroes have their beginnings in the 1990s. I loved Zidane and I love him now for his vision, dribbling skills and technical ability. He makes football seem tremendously easy and this is surely a sign of a true master.
As for the heroes of today, none of them holds a candle to Zidane of the 90s, the likes of Platini and Maradone of the 80s and Pele and his illustrious Co of the 70s.
So, do you think I read your grandfather well?
Liz
loic wrote:
Not to be unkind, but what do German women think of Oliver Kahn? Personally, I think he looks rather terrifying between the posts and any striker would have second thoughts about getting the ball past him, surely.
Haven't got the foggiest...he definitely isn't my cup of tea. (Surprise, surprise...) I don't know about other women but I don't give a toss either way. I like the way you called him a hulk -- this name suits him quite a bit. Although I've never heard him speak, knowing that he's from Bavaria, I picture him speaking with a thick Bavarian accent, which is a wee hulkish in my opinion.
loic wrote:
But you still know a fair bit - enough to spot the difference between bollocks and a Ballack, that's for sure.
Hehe. A rather impressive achievement on my part, isn't it?
loic wrote:
When I think of how much he makes a year, I get insane with jealousy. But who can I blame but the insatiable demand of market forces?
It's high time you started a football carreer... Do you play football yourself or you'd rather enjoy it right in the armchair?
loic wrote:
Speaking of German footballers, what comes to mind when Bastian Schweinsteiger is mentioned? An odd surname, perhaps?
Well...yes. "Schweinsteiger" is a damn funny name, meaning "Pigclimber" literally. It might have an actual meaning which I'm completely unaware of. My knowledge of him is less than nought, converging to minus infinite.
loic wrote:
So, do you think I read your grandfather well?
I guess so. That's basically his football supporting carreer -- what a succint and, at the same time, exhaustive description!
PS: Sorry for being generally a bit ironic on the subject without knowing very much about it.
Loic
Quote:
Do you play football yourself or you'd rather enjoy it right in the armchair?
My incipient footballing career started off under inauspicious circumstances when I went for the school team trials back in primary school. I think I was employed in a make-shift position as a centre-back and promptly sent the school coach into spasms of agony as I scored an own goal in an awful attempt to clear an incoming ball. (Something similar happened when I went for the cricket trials and I was bowled out for a golden duck, meaning I was dismissed by the first ball while scoring naught).
I played plenty of 'street soccer' after classes, though. We used the basketball court for it, much to the dismay of the school basketball team. But frankly, I was awful. My control was never going to be as good as Zidane's - maybe I was slightly worse. I did not possess the vision of Cruijff - but I was not too bad. I am not as tall as that 2 metre tall bamboo Peter Crouch so I was never sent to head the ball in a free kick situation - but I often volunteered myself for the free kick.
Now that I am old, I have retired from the game, I have embarked upon a nascent career as an armchair critic. We live vicariously and I am always very annoyed whenever we hapless armchair critics are lampooned for not walking the talk. But frankly, the game needs us - and we need the game.
Quote:
PS: Sorry for being generally a bit ironic on the subject without knowing very much about it.
Not at all! I am actually delighted that there is someone here who actually possesses a modicum of tolerance for my 'football analysis'.
Deborah
Liz wrote:
Well...yes. "Schweinsteiger" is a damn funny name, meaning "Pigclimber" literally.
So then the late American actor Rod Steiger's name means "rod climber"...a rather suggestive name for someone with such a butch image!
Liz
Deborah wrote:
Liz wrote:
Well...yes. "Schweinsteiger" is a damn funny name, meaning "Pigclimber" literally.
So then the late American actor Rod Steiger's name means "rod climber"...a rather suggestive name for someone with such a butch image!
I was a tad inaccurate there. Although it means "pigclimber" or something similar literally, it should be translated for the sake of fun only. I had the feeling that Schweinsteig must be a place somewhere in Germany. I looked it up and my intuitions were proven right. It is actually a place right Bavaria itself, the area he hails from.
We have lots of geographical names in Hungary as well, but it is generally regarded as a strange coincidence if you happen to have the name of the very place you hail from. I only know one girl who is called Keszthelyi and she is from Keszthely. Most people are comically dislocated.
As for the relatively common family name Steiger (of course, without the Schwein bit), it means some kind of a miner. What's more, I looked the word up and it has another meaning: a womaniser! Mind you, I'm not sure if this meaning is used in reality as I don't always trust bilingual dictionaries, especially not this one. However, Rod Steiger can be jocularly called a rodclimber.
Liz
loic wrote:
Now that I am old, I have retired from the game, I have embarked upon a nascent career as an armchair critic. We live vicariously and I am always very annoyed whenever we hapless armchair critics are lampooned for not walking the talk. But frankly, the game needs us - and we need the game.
Whaat??? Old??? At the risk of being presumptious, may I inquire about your age?
Okay, I know that you are regarded as old to pursue a professional sports career even at your age -- my dad was "retired" from being a professional table tennis player at a pretty early age. Knowing that you are a university student (are you? ), I hazard an educated guess and claim rather boldly that you are somewhere around 20-25 or so.
I don't have anything against armchair critics -- I just prefer doing sports to watching them. That said, I only get knife-edge sardonic by mentioning the names of some box, football etc. trainers and P.E. teachers who don't do sports anymore, grow fat and keep verballing their students/pupils down for not being fast and strong enough. My father, who is professional trainer and still an active sportsman at the age of 50 (aikido, table tennis, horse riding -- he is professional in the first one, used to be professional in the second one, the third one is merely a hobby for him, albeit one of his favourite hobbies), feels the same way.
Loic
I'm 23.
Well, do you also play table-tennis? There was a short phase in secondary school when I was crazy over table-tennis but my interest spluttered to a halt when I left school. It's really cool that your father played table tennis professionally.
Akido is something like Japanese fencing, isn't it? Isn't that a rather esoteric sport for a European?
So what games do you play? Personally, I like watching sports as much as playing - by watching the professionals, I sometimes get inspired to copy their moves.....to varying degrees of failure.
Currently, my attention is strictly focussed on the third Test between the West Indies and England (Did your years in England teach you anything about cricket?) as well as the French Open. Looks like another consecutive showdown between Federer and Nadal.
Liz
loic wrote:
I'm 23.
Bingo! That was my guess, too -- secretly.
loic wrote:
Well, do you also play table-tennis? There was a short phase in secondary school when I was crazy over table-tennis but my interest spluttered to a halt when I left school. It's really cool that your father played table tennis professionally.
He won lots of national championships that time and as far as I know he did quite well in some of the international ones, too. I've never played table tennis professionally but I used to play it with my father a couple of times. I can't really play it as I have practically no routine whatsoever but he kept serving me in such a skillful manner that I felt like someone who actually *can* play table tennis.
loic wrote:
Akido is something like Japanese fencing, isn't it? Isn't that a rather esoteric sport for a European?
Not quite but it's part of it, too. It's like some kind of wrestling but because of the circular movements it looks pretty similar to dancing, so it's quite a pleasure to watch (at least to me). Yeah, it might be somewhat esoteric to most Europeans, especially to those who are only accustomed to competitive combat sports.
loic wrote:
So what games do you play? Personally, I like watching sports as much as playing - by watching the professionals, I sometimes get inspired to copy their moves.....to varying degrees of failure.
I used to play football, basketball and volleyball at school, just for fun, not professionally. I used to play what you'd call "street soccer" and plain playground football when we lived on a housing estate a long time ago. We had to ice-skate and swim at primary school -- I still love to swim but I'm quite afraid of water when it's frozen. So, ice-skating seems to be out of the question for a while, but I want to get rid of my inhibitions and try it again. My dad and his sister (my aunt), both of them brilliant hobby ice-skaters, are nagging me all the time, so I think I must give in.
I spent ten years with folk dancing, and I was involved in modern and jazz dance for a shorter period, too. I used to play badminton professionally (there is such a thing!) but I didn't last there too long as I hated the very idea of serving your partner "badly" so that he/she couldn't get the ball.
Of course, I did and I'm still doing aikido rather sporadically, on a "when-I-have-time-and-I'm-in-the-mood" basis. I know it isn't good but that's the way I am, unfortunately. My dad always encouraged but never forced me to go to trainings -- it might be better doing it sporadically and enjoying it than being forced to do it and quitting for good by the time you grow up. Otherwise, I try to do gymnastics and go running every day. Mind you, I'm a hopeless runner. Although I excelled at long distance, I daresay I'm the worst short distance runner in Europe because I'm not fast -- I can't be since I've inherited my physique from my father which makes me (us) incapable for running really fast. On the face of it, we look like potential good runners (especially my father) and I've been constantly told: "but you have the figur for it". Nonsense...some of my classmates half as tall and twice as fat as me could run much faster.
Anyway, if I don't do sports, I feel deep down in the dumps.
loic wrote:
Currently, my attention is strictly focussed on the third Test between the West Indies and England (Did your years in England teach you anything about cricket?) as well as the French Open. Looks like another consecutive showdown between Federer and Nadal.
Well, to be perfectly honest, my answer to your question is a definite "no". For some reasons, I've always considered cricket (along with golf, fencing and horseriding -- but I love fencing and horseriding) a sport/hobby typical of the upper classes, which aren't exactly the social circles I'd fit in. You don't even need a college degree to guess that I've never been enthusiastic about cricket nor do I know much about the game itself. And what about you? How did you get involved in playing/watching cricket? Was it "love" at first sight? Is it popular in Singapore?
Funnily enough, I have a morbid aversion towards golf...it's not the game itself but the atmosphere of the whole thing which makes me cringe...a wee bit snobby in my opinion. Apart from that, it must be a fun game. My cousin was crazy about it and set up a golf-course in their garden (which isn't the biggest garden I've ever seen) and -- even worse -- in their house, upstairs. Needless to say, breaking some fragile objects was just par for the course, to use the aproppriate golf terminology. So, we were kindly asked to play outside and so did we -- nothing like the way professionals play it, just in our aspiring lower middle class manner.
Deborah
Liz wrote:
Otherwise, I try to do gymnastics and go running every day.
By "gymnastics", do you mean tumbling/vaulting/balance beam or calisthenics/stretching/weight training?
Quote:
Mind you, I'm a hopeless runner. Although I excelled at long distance, I daresay I'm the worst short distance runner in Europe because I'm not fast -- I can't be since I've inherited my physique from my father which makes me (us) incapable for running really fast. On the face of it, we look like potential good runners (especially my father) and I've been constantly told: "but you have the figur for it". Nonsense...some of my classmates half as tall and twice as fat as me could run much faster.
I gather you're the slow-twitching muscle fiber-type, then.
Quote:
Anyway, if I don't do sports, I feel deep down in the dumps.
I know what you mean. In retrospect, I think I may have been depressed my whole life -- or at least since I hit adolescence -- but being dancer, I had to exercise so many hours a day that I kept myself pretty well-supplied with endorphins, and only had to worry about times like Sundays. After I left the professional dance life, doing only an hour or two of exercise a day left me feeling pretty depressed most of the time. And now, I don't even do that!
Liz
Deborah wrote:
By "gymnastics", do you mean tumbling/vaulting/balance beam or calisthenics/stretching/weight training?
All of them.
Deborah wrote:
I gather you're the slow-twitching muscle fiber-type, then.
Yes, I am.
Deborah wrote:
I know what you mean. In retrospect, I think I may have been depressed my whole life -- or at least since I hit adolescence -- but being dancer, I had to exercise so many hours a day that I kept myself pretty well-supplied with endorphins, and only had to worry about times like Sundays. After I left the professional dance life, doing only an hour or two of exercise a day left me feeling pretty depressed most of the time. And now, I don't even do that!
Do you do anything instead?
Deborah
Liz wrote:
Do you do anything instead?
Yes -- I spend a lot of time on langcafe!
Liz
Deborah wrote:
Liz wrote:
Do you do anything instead?
Yes -- I spend a lot of time on langcafe!
That's the best sport!
Loic
Liz:
So you probably know who's Peter Gade Christensen. You're awfully sporty, Liz. Remind me to never play badminton with you then. The last time I played badminton was when I was in primary school.
Badminton is the de facto sport here although its popularity has waned in recent years. We used to be very good although I must add that our heydays were really only during the colonial times when we had shuttlers who were able to challenge for the likes of the Thomas Cup as well as the All England.
But since you are intimately connected with the sport, do you know Taufik Hidayat? I really adore his drop shot as well as his backhand smash. Singapore hosts the Aviva Open every year and I had the opportunity to watch him duel against top seed Lin Dan and the match was as exciting as any popular football derby.
I probably didn't play as many sports as you did. Honestly speaking, I am only confident in one sport and that is squash. I fully expect to be utterly humiliated in every other sport I dabble in - tennis, golf, cricket, football, table-tennis. Like you, I am not a good short-distance hurtler but I tend to do rather well for the middle distance range (2 to 5 km) as it was my speciality in the army. Every year, we have a physical fitness test for soldiers and reservists alike in which we have to run 2.4 km as part of the test. I was pretty decent running 2.4 km back then if you wish to consider recreational running as a sort of sport. A gold timing obliges the runner to clock a timing below 9 min 45 seconds.
As for cricket's popularity in Singapore, a cursory glance at the ICC League rankings paints a fuller picture: Singapore is only ranked 30th in the world. I do not attribute the derisory ranking to a paucity of talent but rather a dearth of involvement at the grassroots level. Most cricketers here are club players and none of them are professionals. I was involved in the sport only in secondary school. Cricket is really seen as an "Indian" sport here and the more racist amongst us would not want to be seen playing this sport.
So it is really laughable when you associate cricket with middle-upper classes. In the Indian subcontinent, cricket is played everywhere. I like to relate a story of how my friend went to Mumbai for a varsity tennis competition. He was in a taxi and there was a massive jam. He asked the taxi driver about the cause of the jam and was enlightened when he replied that some boys were playing cricket in the middle of a road ahead and that was hence the reason for the gridlock.
Apart from the Indian subcontinent, cricket is also played by virtually everyone in the English-speaking Carribean. It is basically the only sport which they are good at on the international stage but petty internecine strife between the West Indian islands have resulted in a drastic decline in standards.
In Sri Lanka, the leader of the breakaway terrorist outfit, the Tamil Tigers, postponed his aeroplane raid on the seaside capital of Colombo on the eve of the cricket world cup final because he is renowned to be cricket mad.
In Australia, cricket is actually the most popular sport of choice. However, I'd say Aussie Rules football continues to define the Australian character because it is an indigeneous sport after all and almost everyone in Australia seems to have a favourite rugby or Aussie rules football club to support. Association Rules football is making inroads in Australia much to the disquiet of fans of the other football codes. Not too long ago, soccer was actually seen by many Australians as a sport for Sheilas, Wogs and Pooftas (women, European immigrants and homosexuals in Australian speak).
In NZ, cricket is the national summer sport. I am always hence constantly bemused whenever people continue to make this erroneous association of cricket as a snobbish sort of sport with highfalutin notions of fair play and gentlemanly behaviour. All very commendable indeed, but the belief that cricket is character building is only alive in the public schools all over the world modelled after the English ones. Outside of this exalted realm, it is win at all cost.
My cricket channel in Singapore is basically an Indian channel and if you were to ever watch their advertisements, you'd realise how cricket mad that country is. Many advertisements employ cricketing themes: there was a 7Up advert in which a boy frustratedly practises his tennis backhand in vain before a 7Up mascot popped out from nowhere to hand him a cricket bat.
Or a ridiculous one by Visa about Sachin Tendulkar batting with the Visa logo emblazoned on each ball.
Due to the Indian influx (the percentage of Indians in Singapore have crept up from the traditional 7% to 10% in recent years), the sport is receiving a massive fillip. The SCA (Singapore Cricket Association) aims to have our country be a Test playing nation by 2020. I am awaiting this day with bated breath.
By the way, cricket is not really a middle-class pursuit in Yorkshire. I've read the autobiography of Ian Botham, an England all-rounder from the 80s, and he wrote that cricket is as much working class in the North as rugby league and football.
Liz
loic wrote:
You're awfully sporty, Liz. Remind me to never play badminton with you then. The last time I played badminton was when I was in primary school.
Although I like doing sports and playing games, I was always considered "spastic" by my peers and P.E. teachers alike back at school because I wasn't fast.
I decided to play badminton professionally because I've always been good at playground badminton. Okay, not always -- I was quite lousy at it until me dad taught me playing it well. I didn't know it was slightly different from badminton as a competitive sport. Only the one gets points who served when the partner misses the ball. My partners almost always missed the ball after they had served, which was rather unfortunate from my point of view. So, I didn't last there too long. Not to mention that bloody short distance running in the beginning of the training.
So, why not play badminton with you? It's not a matter of life and death.
loic wrote:
Badminton is the de facto sport here although its popularity has waned in recent years. We used to be very good although I must add that our heydays were really only during the colonial times when we had shuttlers who were able to challenge for the likes of the Thomas Cup as well as the All England.
Is it? I'm taken aback, however, it's good news to hear. It isn't really taken seriously in Hungary. Most people think it's Mickey Mouse, easy-peasy lemon sqeezy alibi sport.
loic wrote:
But since you are intimately connected with the sport, do you know Taufik Hidayat?
Unfortunately no. I haven't got the foggiest. But he's got a nice name.
loic wrote:
So it is really laughable when you associate cricket with middle-upper classes.
Laughable or not, that was my impression somehow. I didn't say it's justified as I'm pretty ignorant of the issue and thus I can't speak with authority. Now I see I'm mistaken.
Oh Dear...you know your onions, Loic. You could write a book on the history of cricket.
loic wrote:
I am always hence constantly bemused whenever people continue to make this erroneous association of cricket as a snobbish sort of sport with highfalutin notions of fair play and gentlemanly behaviour. All very commendable indeed, but the belief that cricket is character building is only alive in the public schools all over the world modelled after the English ones. Outside of this exalted realm, it is win at all cost.
I didn't say cricket was snobbish -- that was golf. Besides, "upper class" and "upper middle class" aren't pejorative adjectives in my book at all.
Anyway, there is nothing wrong with character building.
Loic
I think you're self-deprecating, Liz. You might not be as fast as lightning but you would still have possessed all the neccessary attributes such as a quick reaction, superb eye-hand co-ordination, agility, nimbleness and a fair bit of switness in order to succeed at badminton.
Speaking of badminton, the sport has undergone a seachange as far as the scoring system is concerned. I remembered that it used to be server's point back when I was in primary school and matches meander interminably till 15 points. You do not watch much badminton, I take it? Taufik Hidayat is the top shuttler for Indonesia and as you are probably aware, the world powerhouses in the sport are Indonesia, China and to a lesser extent, India and Malaysia.
That is why I mentioned Peter Gade Christensen in my opening sentence. For so long, he has been the only European to successfully challenge for top honours. I remember his blonde fiancee as well who also happens to be a badminton player. A very good looking couple, if you ask me.
Playing badminton burns a lot of calories in an hour. It is a lot like squash, I suppose. Of course, there are as many differences as there are similarities. Have you tried squash, by the way? I know squash is a fairly Commonwealth sport, but if you had dabbled with badminton, you must surely have heard of squash.
I apologise if I had been a bit aggressive in defending the plebeian nature of cricket. I merely wanted to demonstrate why the notion of cricket being all about the refined sound of leather against willow is out-of-date. However, some vestiges of the earlier Victorian ethos continue to survive in the sport. For example, a player who swears in the vicinity of an umpire does so on pain of a fine. Players do not dispute the decisions of umpires even if the umpires, who are mostly old fat men anyway, are mistaken. This is totally different from football where enraged players sometimes gather around the referee in a bid to rough him up.
As for the allegedly snobbish nature of golf, I think this must be a European thing. Golf must be expensive in Europe. Over here, it is not. I am not going so far as to say golf is dirt cheap in Singapore, but let's just say that it is a myth that one needs thousands of dollars to play the sport. I seldom go to the golf course, preferring to perfect my shots in the driving range. When I do play on the course, I'd choose off-peak hours where demand for tee time is not as ferocious. Besides, I have a tendency to melt down whenever I am teeing off in front of strangers. Playing before others always seem to bring out the worst in me.
Maybe the only 'snobbish' aspect of golf is the sport's strict adherence to correct attire. However, I've played golf in bermudas before so I do not think the dress code is very severe. The club managers are just obsessed with a collar t-shirt; they are allergic to t-shirts, it seems.
I still remember one particularly memorable golfing experience. I chose an executive golf course which was definitely cheaper for me. I sliced the ball into the trees adjacent to the rough and a monkey actually scampered across the fairway moments later with my ball in its hands.
Suffice to say, I took a mulligan, meaning I teed off again without a penalty stroke.
Liz
loic wrote:
You do not watch much badminton, I take it?
You're right -- I don't. It doesn't get much publicity here. I've never seen a single match on TV because they aren't broadcast. On which channels could I see them? I don't think I have such channels. However, I've seen many championships live.
loic wrote:
Playing badminton burns a lot of calories in an hour. It is a lot like squash, I suppose. Of course, there are as many differences as there are similarities. Have you tried squash, by the way? I know squash is a fairly Commonwealth sport, but if you had dabbled with badminton, you must surely have heard of squash.
Of course I did. I used to know lots of people in England who played squash and it's quite big in Hungary nowadays, however, I've never tried it but I might want to one time. Quite honestly, I prefer "normal" tennis but I can't really play it as I've tried it only a couple of times.
loic wrote:
I apologise if I had been a bit aggressive in defending the plebeian nature of cricket.
No hard feelings. However, I don't think you were aggressive. It's pretty natural to feel sensitive on issues you are deeply involved in.
loic wrote:
Playing before others always seem to bring out the worst in me.
I loathe it, too. It's especially embarrassing to dance when others are watching you, let alone working out in a crowded gym. Some people don't seem to be intimidated by neither of these situations, though.
loic wrote:
As for the allegedly snobbish nature of golf, I think this must be a European thing. Golf must be expensive in Europe.
It's bloody expensive...leastways, it *is* over here. It requires considerable amount of money to set up an only halfway decent golf course and buy all the necessary pieces of equipment. Although it's not a matter of life and death in this case (unlike in the case of, say, mountain climbing), I still think you shouldn't choose the sort of gadgets you can find in Tescoes but rather some quality stuff instead. At least if you wanna play it professionally -- otherwise the self-made things my cousin and I used to have will suffice and do just fine.
loic wrote:
Maybe the only 'snobbish' aspect of golf is the sport's strict adherence to correct attire. However, I've played golf in bermudas before so I do not think the dress code is very severe. The club managers are just obsessed with a collar t-shirt; they are allergic to t-shirts, it seems.
Well, I have to say you hit the nail on the head! That's exactly what I'm talking about. Sometimes when I'm watching golf championships I have the feeling that they pay much more attention to the attire than to the play itself. Okay, I'm exaggerating slightly, and it may not be so in the case of professionals but I know some rich people (mostly the nouveau riche who are inherently prone to exaggerate things a bit) who are preoccupied with the dress code, even if they play it as a hobby only. I don't see the obsession with collared shirts...I seem to be just the opposite -- I have a peculiar aversion towards collared shirts and I like T-shirts. It might has got something to do with my buttoned blouses and shirts "phobia", too. I've always hated to wear them - I don't wear them, anyway.
loic wrote:
I still remember one particularly memorable golfing experience. I chose an executive golf course which was definitely cheaper for me. I sliced the ball into the trees adjacent to the rough and a monkey actually scampered across the fairway moments later with my ball in its hands.
Poor you...I wouldn't have been in your place.
Deborah
loic wrote:
I still remember one particularly memorable golfing experience. I chose an executive golf course which was definitely cheaper for me. I sliced the ball into the trees adjacent to the rough and a monkey actually scampered across the fairway moments later with my ball in its hands.
I'm laughing out loud, picturing that! It should be in a movie.
Loic
Unfortunately, that course is infested with our simian cousins. They are not even scared of golf balls. Nor would they shriek from them even if you were to shout 'Fore!' as manly as possible.
Liz, I am not too sure about badminton channels. Over here, they are shown on terrestrial channels and they are often given a delayed telecast past the witching hour. Badminton can be a little monotoneous if the quality of play on offer is uninspiring. Watching women's badminton used to be a pain in the neck, but the prospects are looking much brighter especially since they have started wearing cute skirts and tighter tops.
As for golfing attire, I think many golfers are actually quite boring in their fashion sense. No sartorical value at all. There are a few snappy dressers on the PGA tour, but most simply stick to the boring polo shirt-trousers routine. Here is one golfer I used to lionise because I thought he looks so cool with shades:
Former world number 1, David Duval. Nowadays, he actually struggles to make the cut in the more prominent Opens but still gets invited to Masters by virtue of his former greatness.
As you have noticed, he dresses in drab liveless colours. Most male golfers are very uncreative in the wardrobe department - displaying their sponsor logos are more important than power dressing.
I would like all golfers to rever back to the dressing of yore:
This is Harry Vardon whose eponymous grip is my grip of choice. By the way, I doubt the likes of Jim Furyk, Phil Mikelson or Tiger Woods are going to make a creditable challenge for any Opens or Masters if they were to dress like that.
Needless to say, golf is not the sport to play if you want to look preppy. Golf somehow makes you look patrician irrespective of your age.
Play tennis instead!
Damn! Why does my cricket sweater not fit me as snugly as that? Courtesy of Ralph Polo Lauren, by the way.
Yelina
Damn! Why does my cricket sweater not fit me as snugly as that? Courtesy of Ralph Polo Lauren, by the way.[/quote]
That's right! It'd be interesting to see you in such a sweater. Or well, just if it could fit you as well as it fits this model!
Liz
loic wrote:
Watching women's badminton used to be a pain in the neck, but the prospects are looking much brighter especially since they have started wearing cute skirts and tighter tops.
I can assure you that I didn't wear those things...grrrr...
loic wrote:
As for golfing attire, I think many golfers are actually quite boring in their fashion sense. No sartorical value at all.
Are you insinuating that golfers should be paragons of sartorial elegance? Mind you, they are positive they are dressed up impeccably. What kind of attire would you advise them to wear? (What a dodgy sentence structure...Does it makes sense at all?)
loic wrote:
Needless to say, golf is not the sport to play if you want to look preppy. Golf somehow makes you look patrician irrespective of your age.
Play tennis instead!
Damn! Why does my cricket sweater not fit me as snugly as that? Courtesy of Ralph Polo Lauren, by the way.
Oh, no... Tennis is another "good-sport-but-lousy-attire" type of thing. This man looks like a bit of a metrosexual, doesn't he? Not my cup of tea, really Besides, sweaters with shorts seem like a rather off-the-wall idea to me.
Loic
Liz:
I beg to differ, really. Tennis has very attractive attire if the players respect the spirit of the game. No Rafeal Nadal style singlets for me. More Andy Roddick Lacoste polo shirts, please.
Besides, women's tennis is the only women sport I watch for obvious reasons!
In the early 2000s, an English squash player proposed this as the new attire for women:
Miss Vicky Botwright had her request turned down by the reactionary squash association, much to my dismay!
As for golfing attire, I think Jesper Parvenik has an innate sense of style - or has a girlfriend who tells him what to wear.
Liz
LOIC:
You are right...generally, they have very attractive attire. Only some of the guys look like metrosexuals.
However, I've never been enthusiastic about Lacoste poloshirts with a lizard on them. Okay, it's a crocodile...
The new attire proposed for female squash players would do just fine if a new branch of squash were proposed, too: water quash! I'd propose speedos for male squash players:
I have a better idea, though...what about G-Strings? Wearing them is not only our privilege, as shown in this picture:
As for Jesper Parvenik, I think I'd go for your second alternative...a girlfriend who has got taste among many other positive qualities always comes in handy...not just in the figurative sense. By the way, hasn't he got a stylist? You didn't list this option, did you?
Loic
Goodness! Male squash players would be hounded into extinction the moment they step inside the courts wearing that tiny piece of garment. Besides, we are also painfully alive to the existence of nationwide scrutiny the moment Wispa (the international squash body) mandates such attire for all players.
But for female squash players, it is different! Haha. I cannot say why the same rules do not apply. I'd just like to reiterate my disappointment when Vicky Botwright's request to play in a thong was turned down. In fact, I was ribbing my female squash mates about the possibility of having to turn out for competition in that attire and it thrilled me to no end to listen to their lame excuses of how they would wear no such thing - at least, in public.
Liz
Well, Loic, if you have anything against those tiny pieces of clothing, what about reviving old trends? One piece swimsuits for men, too:
Loic
Not too bad. Very Roaring 20s!
But a bit of Edwardian chic would not be too bad either.
The famous Eton suit
Liz
Oh Dear...we are going to descend (LOL!) or ascend (?) into a fashion thread...
Edwardian chic is very elegant, I feel. However, those cylinders come accross as slightly comical through my "21st century modernised, deprived of the last vestiges of aesthetic flair" eyes. The guy in the middle seems to be too young to wear such a hat.
Let's not carry on with our conversation within the narrow confines of tennis attire. Here is a nice picture of a pretty woman from the Victorian era, playing golf:
Although this woman is undoubtedly well-dressed, I don't think male adorers of women's golf (if there is such a thing) would be particularly overjoyed to see those ladies in clothes like this. All the interesting and exciting parts of her body is covered, to the greatest disappointment of male viewers who have a burning desire for seeing those women in a swimsuit. C'est la vie.
Loic
I suppose our merry diversion into fashion is inevitable, given that there is only so much we can talk about national football teams from Europe.
Speaking of football, have you read about Thierry Henry moving to Barcelona? What a shock. My heart skipped a beat when I read it. But maybe it would not be a catastrophe for all Gunners out there. Our future lies in Arsene Wenger and Cesc Fabregas and while I would love to see our captain serving out his final years at the Emirates, it is received wisdom that our former linchpin has left his best years behind.
I was skimming the sport pages today and I saw a few photos from the Royal Ascot which instantly made me think of this thread, seeing how we have been discussing about the merits and demerits of being dressed to please in a sport.
I would not say that the jockeys are at the epitome of sartorial elegance. I think the horses are more majestic than their lilliputian riders. But the trouble which all the guests take to getting into the spirit of the occasion simply blows me away.
It seems that a morning frock and a top hat are de riguer for men, especially if they are visiting the Royal Enclosure.
By the way, that lady dresses like a tart. A high-class callgirl, maybe.
PS: I hope she is not some obscure duchess here whom I have inadvertently offended. But I doubt it.
Liz
Like an inappropriately dressed bride!
She reminds me of Tara Palmer-Tomkinson. She (in the picture) isn't as skinny as her but just as much as vulgar. I guess she isn't a high class call-girl but some obscure duchess whom you have inadvertently offended. Are you sure you were to use the word "inadvertently" in this context? LOL!
Nowadays you can't really tell a duchess from a tart...Sloane Ranger style...Yuck.
PS: A tart can be very delicious...a strawberry tart, for instance.
Pauline
She is a like too fat bride, and her dress is too small so she must cut it
Liz
Pauline wrote:
She is a like too fat bride, and her dress is too small so she must cut it
She isn't very fat but she is too fat to wear this dress because it's at least two size smaller.
Pauline
Liz,
Can you visit the hidden adult thread here? i discovered that it exist, but until today I didn't know. I fidn it very nasty and unjust, as it's possible to tell that you're 18 also when you're 15, but I was honest. If i tell them for example I'm 20, how they knwo I'm not?
Liz
Pauline wrote:
Liz,
Can you visit the hidden adult thread here? i discovered that it exist, but until today I didn't know. I fidn it very nasty and unjust, as it's possible to tell that you're 18 also when you're 15, but I was honest. If i tell them for example I'm 20, how they knwo I'm not?
I can but I'm 22. Sorry Pauline, I musn't reveal the secret.
Ask André.
Pauline
It's absolutly nasty to have some secret, hiddne threads where some poepl can visit but the other people don't knwo abotu them.
Pauline
Porhtos isn't 18 but he can vsiit there.
Liz
Pauline wrote:
Porhtos isn't 18 but he can vsiit there.
Whaaaaaat???????? He shouldn't.
Yelina
I thought he was 18 or 19.
Don't be disappointed Pauline, this hidden thread may not please you as we talk about things young people would consider as disgusting!
Who other can't vsiit the hidden threads as well? Lazar and David? I think that they're younger than 18.
Liz
Pauline wrote:
You deliberatly change the subject.
Who other can't vsiit the hidden threads as well? Lazar and David? I think that they're younger than 18.
I don't know. Why does everybody say that the thread is hidden, anyway? Do they ask for your birthplace when you register? I can't remember. I thought those can visit that thread who find it.
Pauline
How can you find it? I don't knwo much about computers or technical things like hacking or how you can find hidden things. I wil ask Tiorthan.
Yelina
Pauline wrote:
He's 17 I think.
How you knwo what i consider as disgusting?
I assume you'd consider this as disgusting because the majority of young people consider this as such. But well, even if you don't consider this disgusting, I find it good that under age people can't have access to this thread. Sorry, Pauline
Pauline
So about 2 or 3 years of age are such a difference? Why it's hidden? It can be for exmaple on the list but you can read it only when you're 18 or older. I don't like things what are deliberatly secret and hidden.
Anyway now I will make some nice labels fr the jam I've amde with the reaspberries from my gardn. Goodbye.